Search Results for "Article 227 writ jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Article 227 writ jurisdiction"

3439 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3439 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Mundkar Declaration — Res Judicata Not Applicable to Mundkar Proceedings Under Goa Mundkar Act, 1971. Prior Civil Court Eviction Decrees Do Not Bar Mamlatdar from Declaring Mundkar Status as Subject Matter and Relief Are Distinct.

15 Sep 2017

The petitioners, Alfredo M. Rodrigues, Paul S. Rodrigues, and Fatima T. Rodrigues, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Production of Additional Documents in Civil Suit; Upholds Discretionary Order Under Order 7 Rule 14(3) CPC. Trial Court’s Order Allowing Late Production Found Not Perverse and Within Jurisdiction, and High Court’s Supervisory Power Under Article 227 Not Attracted Merely Because Documents Could Have Been Produced Earlier.

2 Jul 2010

The dispute arose from a civil suit for possession and mesne profits concerning a property in Goa. The plaintiffs (respondents) had filed the suit ori...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Pronounces Judgment on Constitutional Validity of Karnataka Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2023 and Karnataka High Court (Amendment) Act, 2023. The Verdict on the Appeal and Connected Petition Remains Unstated in the Available Excerpt of the Judgment.

8 Jul 2026

The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Poonacha, heard a writ appeal a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Complainant in MOFA Case — Sets Aside Sessions Judge's Order on Territorial Jurisdiction. The Court held that under Section 179 CrPC, the Magistrate at Mumbai had jurisdiction to try the offence under Section 13 MOFA read with Section 14, as the agreement was executed and consideration was paid in Mumbai.

3 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Dhirajlal P. Desai, was the original complainant who filed a complaint against respondent nos.2 to 6 alleging commission of an offence...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Validity of APMC Bye-Laws Requiring Traders to Obtain Licenses and Pay Market Fees — Held that Bye-Laws Framed Under Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966 Are Statutory and Binding. Writ petitions challenging bye-laws dismissed as not maintainable without challenging the parent Act.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, who are members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, filed writ petitions challenging the validity of certain bye...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Concurrent findings of default in payment of rent and subletting without consent upheld under Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Order 20 Rule 12 CPC.

30 Apr 2019

The petitioners, Orbit Super Market Private Limited and the legal heirs of Dr. Shrikant Jichkar, challenged concurrent orders of the trial court and a...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Appointment of Administrator for APMC Committee — Appointment of Administrator Without Prior Notice and Without Considering Representation Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that the power under Section 121 of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 must be exercised in accordance with natural justice, and failure to issue show cause notice renders the appointment invalid.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, who were the President, Vice President, and members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), challenged the ap...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Members Challenging Government Circular on Term of Committee — Statutory Rule Under Rule 14(4) of KAPM(R&D) Rules, 1968 Prevails. The court held that the term of the committee continues until the first meeting of the newly constituted committee, and a government circular cannot override the statutory rule.

13 Jun 2016

The case involved a batch of writ petitions filed by members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) challenging a government c...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Committee Members Challenging Government Circular Curtailing Term. Section 7(2) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 mandates continuation of committee until newly elected committee assumes office, overriding executive instructions.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, challenged a Government Circular dated 22-04-2016 that purported to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition Challenging Small Causes Court's Jurisdiction in Rent Control Exemption Case. Section 41 of Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 Confers Jurisdiction Over Landlord-Tenant Suits Irrespective of Applicability of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

21 Oct 2011

The Petitioner, Depe Global Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd., is the landlord, and the Respondent, MPIL Corporation Ltd., is the tenant in respect of suit ...

37 38 39 40 41

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)