Search Results for "Arbitration Act, 1940"

468 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 468 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Maintainability of Section 34 Applications Under Arbitration Act — Preliminary Objection Rejected as District Court Had Jurisdiction to Entertain Applications Under Section 34 of the 1996 Act Despite Decree Under 1940 Act.

The petitioners, proprietors of Soni Medical Stores and Ashish Agencies, filed writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging three ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute for Lack of Merit. Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenge fails as no patent illegality or perversity found in award rejecting damages for breach of contract.

The present petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 25th March 2021 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Fermentation Plant Performance Guarantee. Court Restores Arbitral Award for Rs.68.15 Lakhs as Damages for Non-Performing Machinery, Holding That Such Claim Is Separate from Liquidated Damages and Not Barred by Section 74 of the Contract Act.

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 17th November 1992 between Sahakarmaharshi Bhausaheb Thorat Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (appellant) and Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Commercial Appeal in Arbitration Dispute — Upholds Arbitral Award Rejecting Claim for 2% Contract Value Without Work Execution. Claim for facilitation fee under MOU fails as appellant did not perform any work for the contract awarded to the joint venture.

The appellant, M/s. Pratibha Industries Limited, filed a commercial appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, read with Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Employer in Arbitration Award Dispute — Award Upheld as No Error of Law Apparent on Face. Arbitrator's Award Not Set Aside Despite Limitation Defense Under Section 326 of U.P. Act 2 of 1916; No Legal Proposition Formed Basis of Award.

The dispute arose from a construction contract for pumping stations and reservoirs at Kanpur between the appellant, Kanpur Nagar Mahapalika (formerly ...