High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Petitioner in Co-operative Election Writ Petition. No specific legal finding available as the judgment text is incomplete.
2 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "statutory safeguards"
896 result(s) found
Found 896 result(s)
High Court
High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Former Employees of Wellman Hindustan Limited Challenging Industrial Court Order on Unpaid Wages Under MRTU and PULP Act
24 Feb 2026The High Court of Bombay heard multiple connected writ petitions challenging the Industrial Court's dismissal of a complaint filed by former employees...
- 1004
High Court
Bombay High Court Restrains Developers from Constructing Additional Buildings in Multi-Building Scheme Without Flat Owners' Consent Under MOFA. Disclosure of Potential Additional Construction Held Insufficient Where Specific Representations Were Made About FSI Utilisation and Layout.
22 Jan 2015The dispute centered on a 230-acre development known as the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS), in which several cooperative housing societies of co...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.
18 Jun 2024The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...
- 366
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.
3 Oct 2024The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...
- 477
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Explanations to Rule 38 of MCR, 2016 and Rule 45(8)(a) of MCDR, 2017 — Royalty Computation on Gross Sale Value Without Deduction of Royalty, DMF, and NMET Contributions is Valid. The Court held that royalty is a tax and not a contractual consideration, and the impugned explanations do not violate Article 14 or Article 265 of the Constitution.
15 Nov 2024The petitioners, Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity...
- 473
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Appointment Norms of Information Commissioners Under Right to Information Act, 2005 — Petitioner Alleges Vague Criteria and Lack of Judicial Expertise Violate Fundamental Rights. The Court Examines Whether Sections 12(5) and 15(5) Are Unconstitutional for Not Requiring Judicial Qualifications in Light of the Right to Information and Quasi-Judicial Functions.
1 Aug 2026The petitioner, a public-spirited citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution directly before the Supreme Court, challenging t...
- 47
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Challenged Victim. Mental Age of Adult with Cerebral Palsy Considered for Applicability of Special Procedures under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
1 Aug 2026The case concerned a criminal appeal by the prosecutrix, a 38-year-old woman suffering from cerebral palsy (R. Hemiparesis), through her mother. An FI...
- 81
High Court
- 27
