Search Results for "section 34"

604 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 604 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Upholds Award as Not Suffering from Patent Illegality or Being Against Public Policy, Refusing to Reappreciate Evidence.

The petitioner, Angel Capital & Debt Market Limited, a stock broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 16 May 2009 under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Broadcast Rights Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 4.77 Crore with Interest. Arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages were not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, Maharashtra Film Stage and Cultural Development Corporation Ltd., a Government of Maharashtra corporation, challenged an Arbitral Awar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Pipeline Construction Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Findings of Fact and Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 12% Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Mahanagar Gas Limited, awarded a work order to the respondent, M/s. Babulal Uttamchand & Co., for project management and construction o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Perverse.

The petitioner, Sunil Keshav Rane, challenged an arbitral award dated 28 April 2009 passed by an arbitrator under the Byelaws, Rules and Regulations o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Telecom Billing Dispute — Claim Barred by Section 15 of TRAI Act, 1997. Counterclaim for unpaid bills upheld with 12% interest as petitioner failed to challenge tariff orders before TRAI or Appellate Tribunal.

The petitioner, M/s. Kansan Communications Pvt. Ltd., filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Counterclaim in Share Brokerage Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that appellant failed to prove respondent's negligence in squaring off F&O contracts without notice.

The appellant, Avalon Investment Private Limited, was a client of the respondent, Mukesh Brokerage & Financial Limited, a share broker registered with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Co-ownership Dispute. Court Upholds Award Granting Proportionate Share to Co-owner, Finding No Patent Illegality Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arose from a decision of a Learned Single Judge dated 8 July 2011 dismissing an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Court upholds award granting compensation for work done, security deposit refund, and loss of profit under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Union of India, through the Chief Project Manager (Conversion), Central Railway, Mumbai, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and ...