Search Results for "section 23(3)"

882 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 882 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition by Foreign Shareholder Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 272(1)(e) Companies Act, 2013. Section 272(1)(e) is not ultra vires the Constitution; second proviso to Section 272(3) does not apply to petitions under Section 272(1)(e).

The petitioner, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Mauritius and a shareholder of Devas Multimedia Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Magistrate's Order Refusing to Issue Process Under Section 406 IPC in License Agreement Dispute. Court Held That Dispute Was Purely Civil in Nature and No Criminal Offence Was Made Out.

The petitioner, Sharan P Khanna, owned certain premises and entered into a license agreement with respondent No.1, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute, Holds Sale Deed as Absolute Conveyance Not Mortgage. Separate Agreement for Reconveyance Cannot Convert Sale into Mortgage Under Section 58(c) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The dispute arose from a transaction involving agricultural land measuring 6 acres 2 guntas in Survey No.2/A. The plaintiff (respondent) had taken fin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Workmen Compensation Case — Employer-Employee Relationship Established. Commissioner's Award of Rs.4,23,580/- with 12% Interest Upheld as No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Section 30(1) of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The New India Assurance Company Limited appealed against the award dated 17.01.2012 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Chitradurga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Prosecution Case. Allegation of Pushing Victim from Running Train Fails as Medical Evidence and Witness Testimony Contradict Prosecution Version.

The appellants, Kanchan Deokisanjee Panpalia and Tara Harishkumar Panpalia, were convicted by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences u...