Search Results for "minor injury"

1856 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1856 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Army Officer in POCSO Case. Judicial Review under Article 226 Limited to Jurisdictional Error; No Re-appreciation of Evidence.

The petitioner, a retired Lieutenant Colonel in the Indian Army, was convicted by a General Court Martial (GCM) under Section 69 of the Army Act, 1950...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Milk Tanker Driver Established by Minor Son's Testimony. Court upholds award of Rs.1,65,000 to widow and children of deceased Kailashchandra under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra and other appellants appealed against the judgment and award dated 5 August 1995 of the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal (MACT)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, set aside as eyewitness testimony was found unreliable and uncorroborated, with long-standing enmity casting doubt on prosecution case.

The dispute arose from a murder case where the appellants were convicted under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the killing of Narayan on Sept...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in House Trespass and Assault Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Complainant Failed to Identify Accused and Medical Evidence Contradicted Allegations of Assault with Sticks Under Sections 452, 326, 324, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 31st May 1999 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Paithan, in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reserves Judgment in Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Disappearance of Evidence. Accused Challenges Reliability of Circumstantial Evidence Including Test Identification Parade and Recovery Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 08.12.2020 passed by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 179/2014, convicting ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Confirmation of Death Penalty and Appeals in Family Murders Case. Charges under Section 302 IPC for Killing Wife and Three Children Based on Circumstantial Evidence.

The Confirmation Case No.3 of 2005 and Criminal Appeal No.518 of 2005 arose out of the conviction of the accused Ajitsingh Harnamsingh Gujral by the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of Minor Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Penetration and Prosecution Witnesses Contradicted Each Other.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Ajay Keshav @ Kiran Malekar for offences under Section 376(2)(f)(i) of the Indian Penal Code and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Tulshiram Balaji Pupalwad, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Shankar Venkat Papulwad. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Upholds Conviction for Murder in Grampanchayat Election Rivalry Case. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for fatal knife attack on deceased due to political grudge.

The appellant, Tulshiram S/o Balaji Pupalwad, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge at Biloli for the murder of Shankar Venkat Papulwad under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Vitthal Tukaram Kadam and his son Somnath Vitthal Kadam, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karad, for the murder of Lal...