Search Results for "endorsement refused"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "endorsement refused"

788 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 788 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail to Accused in Murder Case Due to Non-Completion of Investigation Within 90 Days. Right to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC Not Defeated by Subsequent Filing of Charge Sheet.

3 Nov 2020

The petitioners, Dattatraya Ankush Pathade and Sonali Satish Wakade, were arrested in connection with Crime No.416 of 2020 registered at Shrigonda Pol...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Assessee's Appeal in Sales Tax Case — Revisional Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Penalty under Section 8(3)(b) of CST Act, 1956 Quashed as Assessee Was Not Given Opportunity to Cross-Examine Driver of Vehicle.

23 Jan 2025

The appellant, M/S Apotex Research Private Limited, an assessee under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, filed a Sales Tax Appeal under Section ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for PL Encashment Despite Dismissal — Penalty of Dismissal Does Not Forfeit Privilege Leave Encashment Unless Service Rules Expressly Provide. Leave encashment is a vested right and not forfeited by dismissal in the absence of express rule.

19 Feb 2025

The petitioner, G. Linganagouda, a former Assistant Manager of Pragathi Krishna Gramina Bank (now Karnataka Gramina Bank), was dismissed from service ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the cause of action under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 arises only at the place where the cheque is presented and dishonoured, not at the place of issuance or the complainant's registered office.

3 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Mrs. Preetha S. Babu, a resident of Ernakulam, Kerala, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Amalgamation Notification for Lack of Consent — Amalgamation Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act Requires Consent of Both Market Committees. Withdrawal of Consent by One Committee Renders the Process Invalid.

17 Aug 2010

The petitioners, Sopanrao Sathe (Chairman) and the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Malkapur, challenged a notification dated 17-01-2009 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Land Acquisition Reference on Limitation Grounds. Notice Under Section 12(2) Served on 27.10.2003, Reference Filed on 9.12.2003 Held Within Time Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

14 Oct 2010

The petitioners, nine individuals whose lands were acquired for the construction of the Urdhav Pravara right canal, challenged the order of the Specia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Leave to Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Attachment by Crime Branch Not Covered Under Section 138 NI Act. Cheque dishonour due to bank account attachment by Crime Branch does not constitute an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as it is not a dishonour for insufficiency of funds or arrangement.

22 Mar 2011

The appellant, Ashish Parikh, proprietor of Parikh Investments, filed a criminal application seeking leave to appeal against an order of acquittal pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Insufficient Funds Defence Fails as Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Revisional Court Confirms Sentence of One Month Simple Imprisonment and Fine of Rs.1,000 for Dishonour of Cheque Issued for Repayment of Loan.

7 Jul 2011

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Dhondiba Nagoba Ladke, the original accused, challenging his conviction under Section 138 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Striking Off Wife's Defence for Breach of Access Order in Divorce Proceedings. Family Court's Power Under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Includes Striking Off Defence for Non-Compliance with Interim Orders.

22 Aug 2011

The case involves a writ petition filed by the wife, Mrs. Vimi Vinod Chopra, challenging the order of the Family Court No. 4, Mumbai dated 13.10.2010,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Leave to Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Acquittal Upheld Due to Failure to Prove Debt or Liability. The court held that the complainant failed to establish the existence of a legally enforceable debt or liability as required under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as the cheque was issued for a policy that was never drawn.

21 Jan 2019

The applicant, Harilal Khurdhan Ram, an LIC agent, filed a criminal application seeking leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 24th Nove...

36 37 38 39 40

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)