High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Pertaining to Agricultural University Employees. Disputes Concern Employment Status and Retirement Benefits Under Maharashtra Agricultural Universities Act, 1968.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "common petition"
8746 result(s) found
Found 8746 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Hears Letters Patent Appeals Against Writ Petition Order in Co-operative Sugar Factory Dispute — Appeals involve allegations of mismanagement, enquiry under Section 83 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, and liquidation proceedings.
15 Jan 2010The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard two Letters Patent Appeals (No. 197 of 2009 and No. 239 of 2009) arising from Writ Petitio...
High Court
SECOND APPEAL NO. 148 OF 2016
21 Dec 2016The dispute centered on rights to perform pooja and collect offerings at Goddess Shree Rupa Bhavani Temple in Solapur, registered as a public trust. T...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Workers' Appeal in Contract Labour Dispute — IPCA Laboratories Held Liable as Principal Employer Under Contract Labour Act. The court held that the Labour Enforcement Officer's complaint under Section 22A of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 was maintainable and that the company was the principal employer, rejecting the company's challenge to the cognizance order.
23 Nov 2022The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals arising from a common order in Writ Petition No. 2791 of 2009. The appellants in LPA No. 270 of 2009 are ...
- 60
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Election Petition Challenging MLC Election Due to Non-Compliance with Section 81 of Representation of People Act, 1951 — Petition Filed Beyond Limitation and Lacks Material Facts. The court held that the election petition must be filed within 45 days from the date of election and must contain material facts; failure to do so results in rejection under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
18 Feb 2021The petitioner, Shri Ravi Shivappa Padasalagi @ Savadi, filed an election petition under Section 81 read with Section 100(1)(d)(iv) of the Representat...
- 129
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Interim Award on Limitation in Commercial Arbitration. Winding Up Proceedings Constitute Civil Proceedings for Exclusion of Time Under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963.
18 Sep 2018The dispute arose from a purchase order dated 24 June 2013 placed by Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. (petitioner) on Inspira IT Products Pvt. Ltd. (res...
- 67
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Property Development Dispute. Petitioners Argue Award is Unreasoned and Arbitrator Failed to Independently Analyze Submissions, Seeking Set Aside.
19 Nov 2025Background: The matter involved a property development dispute concerning three tribal (Adivasi) lands in Malad, Mumbai. The petitioners were legal he...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints for Dishonour of Cheques Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that the complainant must prove that the demand notice was sent to the correct address of the accused by registered post with acknowledgment due, failing which the complaint is not maintainable.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves a batch of criminal writ petitions filed by the petitioners (Prabhakar Dattatraya Gune, Sanjay Chandrakant Kirloskar, and M.V. P...
- 160
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Monsanto's Petition on Seed Supply as Sale, Allows Subway's Petition on Franchise as Service. Court Holds That Impregnated Seed Supply is Sale of Goods Under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, While Franchise Agreement is Not a Deemed Sale of Intellectual Property Rights.
11 Aug 2016The Bombay High Court adjudicated two writ petitions tagged together, raising the common issue of whether certain transactions were liable to service ...
- 36
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Contempt Action Against Judges for Alleged Judicial Misconduct. Court holds that judges cannot be prosecuted for acts done in judicial capacity and that contempt of court proceedings cannot be initiated against judges for their judicial orders.
6 May 2016The petitioners, Common Citizen of India (Common Man) through Rakesh Omprakash Agarwal and Peoples Rights Vigilance Organisation, filed a writ petitio...
- 100
