Search Results for "Prosecutrix testimony"

520 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 520 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Partially Allows Criminal Appeal -- Acquits Appellant Under Section 376-AB of IPC In POCSO u/s 4(2)Case Due To Lack Of Kidnapping Evidence -- Convictions Under Sections 363, 354-A(2) and 8 of POCSO maintained Upheld

The appellant challenged his conviction for offences under IPC and POCSO Act. The High Court analyzed the evidence, focusing on the victim's testimony...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support the prosecution case.

The case involves three criminal appeals arising from a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, convicting Suresh @ Tatya Parshuram Powar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheating Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Dishonest Inducement. Conviction under Section 420 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that appellant had fraudulent intention at the time of promise to marry.

The appellant, Sanjay Dhondu Manchekar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in Cheating and Extortion Case Due to Civil Dispute and Delayed Filing. Court holds that criminal proceedings cannot be used as a tool for recovery of money in a consensual relationship.

The applicant, Ujwala Prakash Sahare, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking qua...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Mentally Retarded Woman Due to Lack of Consent Evidence. Conviction under Section 376(2)(l) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove absence of consent and knowledge of mental retardation.

The present appeal challenged the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 376(2)(l) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the rape o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Appeal in Human Trafficking Case Involving Cross-Border Offence and Age Determination. The court examines the requirement of sanction under Section 188 CrPC for offences partly committed in India and evaluates medical evidence on victim's age under the POCSO Act.

The appeal arose from a conviction by the High Court of Uttarakhand in a human trafficking case. The appellant, an Indian citizen, was accused of enti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and SC/ST Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 3(1)(xi) of SC & ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Aannaso Shripal Bukade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Kolhapur in Sessions Case No.159 of 2006 for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Consent Proof. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Absence of Consent Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Chandrashekhar s/o Bhagwan Meshram, was convicted by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, for an offence under Section 376...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Sentence of Uncle Convicted for Rape of Niece Due to Special Reasons and Pre-amendment Provision. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC Upheld but Sentence Reduced from 7 to 5 Years with Compensation of Rs.1,00,000 to Victim.

The appellant, Umesh Tulshiram Kolhe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, for offences under Sections 376(1) and 506 of the Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Age of Victim Determined by Ossification Test and School Records, Consent Irrelevant for Minor.

The appellant, Sujoy @ Sanjay Laltu Chakravarty, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gondia, in Special POCSO Case No. 11/2014 for offences under Sect...