Search Results for "POCSO"

543 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 543 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition in POCSO Case — No Violation of Article 22 or BNSS Provisions Found. Detention of Accused in Custody for Offences Under IPC, POCSO Act, and Immoral Traffic Act Held Lawful.

The petitioner, Ashok Sahadev Patil, filed a Habeas Corpus petition before the Bombay High Court challenging his detention in connection with C.R.No.4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Default Bail in POCSO Case Due to Non-Completion of Investigation Within 60 Days. Petitioner Entitled to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC as Charge Sheet Filed After Expiry of 60 Days from First Remand.

The petitioner, Moulali, was arrested on 01.12.2024 in connection with offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 506 of IPC and Sections 4, 6, 8, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for School Teacher in POCSO Case — Conviction Based on Child Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Found Reliable.

The appellant, Kesarinandan Sabhapati Upadhyay, was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Mumbai, under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age of Victim. Birth Certificate with overwriting and lack of ossification test render age of victim unproven, vitiating conviction under Sections 376(2)(i),(n) IPC, Goa Children's Act, and POCSO Act.

The appellant, Santosh Gore, was convicted by the Children's Court for the State of Goa in Special Case No.36/2017 for offences under Section 376(2)(i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Ten-Year Rigorous Imprisonment Affirmed. Victim's Consistent Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Penetrative Sexual Assault Despite Delay in FIR.

The appellant, Amol S/o Raju Nindekar, was convicted by the Special Court, Chandrapur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i)(n) of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Conviction under Sections 3(a), 5(j)(ii), 5(l) of POCSO Act and Sections 376, 417 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's age not proven beyond reasonable doubt and relationship was consensual.

The appellant, Kundan Pendor, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 3(a), 5(j)(ii), and 5(l) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unreliable Child Witness and Lack of Identification. Conviction under Sections 9 and 10 of POCSO Act, 2012 and Section 354-A IPC set aside as child witness admitted tutoring by grandmother and failed to identify accused.

The appellant, Subhash Balkrushna Buradkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, in Sessions Case No. 2 of 2013 for offences un...