Search Results for "Negotiable Instruments"

1381 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1381 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Dismissal of Complaint for Non-Prosecution Under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act. Magistrate's Order of Acquittal Under Section 256 CrPC Upheld as Complainant Failed to Secure Accused's Presence Despite Five Years of Opportunity.

The applicant, Agasti Sarv Seva Sangh, filed a criminal complaint against the respondent, Bandu Morsing Pawar, alleging offences under Section 138 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Dismissal of Complaint for Default in Absence of Accused — Section 256 CrPC Not Applicable When Accused Absent. Complaint Under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Restored as Magistrate Exceeded Jurisdiction.

The applicant, Agasti Sarv Seva Sangh, filed a criminal complaint against the respondent, Rohidas Dharma Rathod, alleging offences under Section 138 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Compromise Cheque Dishonour Constitutes Separate Offence. Settlement of earlier cheques does not discharge liability under a fresh cheque issued as part of the compromise.

The appellant, Prabhakar Gaidhane, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Nivruti Kamdi, by the Judicial Magistrate, First C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 operates in favour of complainant once issuance and signature are admitted, shifting burden on accused to rebut.

The appellant, Pandurang Ramchandra Ghorpade, filed two criminal appeals against the acquittal of respondent No.1, Vijay Gopala Lohar, in two separate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Failure to Prove Debt. Complainant failed to establish legally enforceable debt or liability under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as loan transaction was not proved.

The appellant, Meera S. Chiplunkar, was the original complainant in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the resp...