Bombay High Court Dismisses Pre-emption Suit as Barred by Limitation — Portuguese Civil Code Article 1566 Governs Period for Pre-emption in Goa. Court holds that Article 1566 of Portuguese Civil Code, 1867 providing a 6-month limitation period for pre-emption suits is not impliedly repealed by the Indian Limitation Act, 1963.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Prosecution
  • 111
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellants filed a suit for pre-emption against the respondents, seeking to exercise their right to purchase property. The suit was dismissed by the trial court on the ground that it was barred by limitation, as per Article 1566 of the Portuguese Civil Code, which prescribes a 6-month limitation period for pre-emption suits. The first appeal was also dismissed. In the second appeal, the appellants argued that the limitation period should be governed by Article 97 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963, which provides a longer period, and that the Portuguese Civil Code provision had been impliedly repealed. The High Court of Bombay at Goa framed two substantial questions of law: (a) whether the limitation period is governed by Article 1566 of the Portuguese Civil Code or Article 97 of the Indian Limitation Act, and (b) whether there has been an implied repeal of the Portuguese Civil Code provision. The court held that Article 1566 of the Portuguese Civil Code continues to apply in Goa and has not been impliedly repealed by the Indian Limitation Act. Consequently, the suit was barred by limitation, and the second appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Limitation - Pre-emption - Period of Limitation - Article 1566 of Portuguese Civil Code, 1867 vs. Article 97 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - The court considered whether the limitation period for a pre-emption suit is governed by the Portuguese Civil Code or the Indian Limitation Act. Held that Article 1566 of the Portuguese Civil Code, which provides a 6-month limitation period, continues to apply in Goa and has not been impliedly repealed by the Indian Limitation Act. (Paras 1-4)

B) Limitation - Implied Repeal - Portuguese Civil Code - Indian Limitation Act - The court examined whether the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 impliedly repealed Article 1566 of the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867. Held that there is no implied repeal as the Portuguese Civil Code is a special law applicable to Goa and the Indian Limitation Act does not expressly or impliedly repeal it. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the limitation period for a suit for pre-emption is governed by Article 1566 of the Portuguese Civil Code or Article 97 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963, and whether the Portuguese Civil Code provision has been impliedly repealed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Second appeal dismissed. The suit for pre-emption is barred by limitation under Article 1566 of the Portuguese Civil Code, which has not been impliedly repealed by the Indian Limitation Act, 1963.

Law Points

  • Pre-emption
  • Limitation
  • Implied Repeal
  • Portuguese Civil Code
  • Indian Limitation Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (02) 143

SECOND APPEAL NO. 50 OF 2002

2014-02-21

Smt. R.S. Dalvi, J.

Mr. S. S. Kantak, Senior Advocate with Mr. P. Talaulikar, Advocate for the appellants; Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate for the respondents

Mrs. Shubangi Apa Dhuri and others

Miss Sharayu Manohar Kolgaokar and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for pre-emption

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to exercise their right of pre-emption against the respondents

Filing Reason

Appellants claimed right of pre-emption over property sold to respondents

Previous Decisions

Suit dismissed by trial court as barred by limitation; first appeal dismissed

Issues

Whether the limitation period for a suit for pre-emption is governed by Article 1566 of the Portuguese Civil Code or Article 97 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 Whether Article 1566 of the Portuguese Civil Code has been impliedly repealed by the Indian Limitation Act, 1963

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that limitation period should be governed by Article 97 of Indian Limitation Act, 1963, and that Portuguese Civil Code provision was impliedly repealed Respondents argued that Article 1566 of Portuguese Civil Code applies and suit is barred by limitation

Ratio Decidendi

The limitation period for a suit for pre-emption in Goa is governed by Article 1566 of the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867, which provides a 6-month period, and this provision has not been impliedly repealed by the Indian Limitation Act, 1963.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellants sued for exercising their right of pre-emption against the respondents. The suit came to be dismissed, inter alia, on the ground that it was barred by the law of limitation. In this second appeal, two substantial questions of law with regard to the period of limitation and implied repeal of the limitation, specifying period of limitation are framed.

Procedural History

The appellants filed a suit for pre-emption which was dismissed by the trial court on limitation grounds. The first appeal was dismissed. The appellants then filed this second appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Goa.

Acts & Sections

  • Portuguese Civil Code, 1867: Article 1566
  • Indian Limitation Act, 1963: Article 97
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Part for Contractual Doctors Seeking Parity in Pay and Benefits with Regular Medical Officers. Court Directs ONGC to Provide Equal Pay and Facilities but Denies Regularization.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Pre-emption Suit as Barred by Limitation — Portuguese Civil Code Article 1566 Governs Period for Pre-emption in Goa. Court holds that Article 1566 of Portuguese Civil Code, 1867 providing a 6-month limitation period for ...