High Court of Karnataka Decides Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification
3 Dec 2015...
Search Results for "General Notice"
12057 result(s) found
Found 12057 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge to No Confidence Motion Against Bar Association President. Petition Seeks to Quash Resolution Passed on 20 September 2025 on Grounds that Bye-laws Do Not Provide for Such Motion.
15 Dec 2025The petitioner, as President of the Belagavi Bar Association, challenged a resolution passed in a Special General Body Meeting on 20 September 2025 th...
- 17
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Ex Parte Temporary Injunction in Membership Dispute — Trial Court Failed to Record Satisfaction of Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Injury Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC. The Court Remanded the Matter for Fresh Hearing After Finding That the Trial Court Did Not Comply With Order 39 Rule 3 CPC Requiring Reasons for Dispensing With Notice.
20 Dec 2024The appellant, Bowring Institute, challenged an order dated 22.11.2024 passed by the 41st Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in O.S....
- 480
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Pune Municipal Corporation Resolution and Circular on Compounding Fees for Building Irregularities. Resolution Held Ultra Vires MRTP Act and BPMC Act as No Power to Levy Such Charges for Regularization Under Section 53(3).
3 Apr 2019The case involved three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging a Resolution date...
- 122
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Revision in Rent Control Eviction Suit — Notice Service Valid Under Section 12(2) of Bombay Rent Act and Slum Act Permission Not Required at Decree Stage. The court held that statutory presumption under Section 27 of General Clauses Act applies to notice service and that Section 22 of Slum Act does not bar maintainability of suit filed before slum notification.
7 Aug 2015The applicant, Indira Rani Ugrasen, filed Civil Revision Application No. 139 of 2007 in the Bombay High Court against the judgments and decrees dated ...
- 91
High Court
High Court Allows Second Appeal of Charitable Trust, Holds that Suit for Exemption from General Tax Not Barred by Want of Statutory Notice Under Section 487 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949. Demand Notice Issued Despite Exemption Held Illegal, Thus Notice Under Section 487 Not Required as Action Not in Execution of the Act.
5 Jul 2018The litigation arose from a civil suit filed by a registered public trust, the appellant, which owned a building used for maintaining cows within the ...
- 10
High Court
Full Bench of the Bombay High Court Considers Reference on Interpretation of Clauses 96 and 97 of MCGM General Conditions of Contract. The Court Examines Whether Compliance with Clause 96 is a Precondition for Invoking Arbitration under Clause 97.
8 Feb 2017The appeal arose from an arbitration petition concerning a contractual dispute between a contractor and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (M...
- 28
Tribunals
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Considers Appeal Against Admission of Coffee Day Enterprises to CIRP Under Section 7 of Insolvency Code. Appeal Raises Questions on the Validity of Debenture Trustee's Action and Limitation Period Based on Debenture Trust Deed Provisions.
1 Jan 1970The appeal arose from an order of the NCLT Bengaluru Bench admitting Coffee Day Enterprises Limited (the corporate debtor) into Corporate Insolvency R...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Slum Land Acquisition and Letter of Intent. Court Holds Petitioner's Ownership Interest Sufficient for Locus Standi but Upholds State Action Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.
24 Nov 2010The case involved two writ petitions filed in 1999 and 2000 under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a land acquisition notification dated 6-...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Stay in No Confidence Motion Case — No Fresh Motion Barred Under Section 35(3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 as First Motion Was Not Moved or Carried.
24 Jan 2014The appellant, Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale, was elected Sarpanch of Theur village panchayat in 2010. On 5 October 2011, a no confidence motion was init...
- 152
