Search Results for "Corrigendum"

472 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 472 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking CBI Investigation into Lavasa Hill Station Project for Lack of Credible Material. Petitioner's vague allegations against politicians and officials did not establish a prima facie case for criminal investigation under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The petitioner, Nanasaheb Vasantrao Jadhav, an agriculturist and advocate, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking a direction for registrati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Surplus Declaration and Absorption Order Against School Teacher for Violation of Rule 26 of MEPS Rules, 1981. Procedural Lapses in Declaring Employee Surplus and Transferring Without Consent or Opportunity of Hearing Lead to Setting Aside of Orders.

The petitioner, Amar Jaggnath Lavate, a teacher employed at Nutan Vidyalaya, Lote (now Kavita Vinod Saraf High School), was declared a surplus employe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Appointment of Court Receiver in Redevelopment Dispute Between Society, Developer, and Occupants. Court Directs Handover of Possession Subject to Payment of Compensation Under Development Agreement.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge appointing the Court Receiver as Receiver of two flats occupied by the appellants and direc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Raymond Limited's Appeals in Central Excise Cenvat Credit Dispute. Cenvat Credit of AED (T&TA) on Inputs Can Be Utilized for Payment of BED on Final Products.

The appellant, Raymond Limited, is a company manufacturing blankets from woollen fibres. The blankets attract only Basic Excise Duty (BED) and not Add...