High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Administrator's Order Under Article 438 of Code of Communidades — Interpretation of 'Consecutive Years' for Dividend Non-Claim Clarified. The court held that the 30-year consecutive period for non-claim of dividends does not require annual dividend declaration; non-declaration does not break continuity.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 72
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Comunidade of Nagoa, represented by its Attorney, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Administrator of Communidades dated 12.11.2009 and the Administrative Tribunal's order dated 14.07.2011, which confirmed the Administrator's order. The petitioner had invoked Article 438 of the Code of Communidades seeking a declaration that the Comunidade had acquired the shares of certain Joneiros or Zonnkars who had not claimed dividends for 30 consecutive years. The Administrator rejected the application on the ground that dividends were not declared for several years (1977, 1979, 1980, 1983, 1984, 1985), and therefore the 30-year consecutive period could not be calculated. The Administrative Tribunal upheld this order. The High Court, after hearing both sides, found that the Administrator and Tribunal had misconstrued Article 438. The court held that the requirement of '30 consecutive years' refers to the period during which dividends have not been claimed, not the period during which dividends were declared. The non-declaration of dividends does not break the continuity of the non-claim period. The court set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter to the Administrator for fresh consideration in accordance with the correct interpretation of Article 438.

Headnote

A) Interpretation of Statutes - Code of Communidades - Article 438 - Consecutive Period of Non-Claim of Dividends - The issue was whether the 30-year consecutive period under Article 438 requires that dividends be declared every year for the period to run. The High Court held that the Administrator erred in requiring dividend declaration each year; the period of non-claim runs from the date dividends were last declared and not claimed, and non-declaration of dividends does not break the consecutive period. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Administrator and the Administrative Tribunal correctly interpreted Article 438 of the Code of Communidades in rejecting the Comunidade's application for declaration of acquisition of shares due to non-claim of dividends for 30 consecutive years.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the orders of the Administrator dated 12.11.2009 and the Administrative Tribunal dated 14.07.2011, and remanded the matter to the Administrator for fresh consideration in accordance with the correct interpretation of Article 438.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of Article 438 of the Code of Communidades
  • Consecutive period of 30 years for non-claim of dividends
  • Requirement of dividend declaration for computing non-claim period
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025:BHC-GOA:2509

WRIT PETITION NO.200 OF 2013

2025-12-17

M. S. SONAK, J.

2025:BHC-GOA:2509

Mr. Joaquim Godinho for Petitioner, Ms. Sulekha Kamat for Respondent

Comunidade of Nagoa, Represented by its Attorney Mr. John Philip Pereira

The Administrator Communidades of South Zone

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging orders of Administrator and Administrative Tribunal under Article 438 of Code of Communidades.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought declaration that shares of certain Joneiros/Zonnkars were acquired by Comunidade due to non-claim of dividends for 30 consecutive years.

Filing Reason

Administrator rejected application on ground that dividends were not declared in some years, breaking the consecutive period.

Previous Decisions

Administrator's order dated 12.11.2009 and Administrative Tribunal's order dated 14.07.2011 rejected the application.

Issues

Whether the 30-year consecutive period under Article 438 requires annual declaration of dividends. Whether non-declaration of dividends breaks the continuity of the non-claim period.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Administrator and Tribunal misconstrued Article 438; the period of non-claim runs from the date dividends were last declared and not claimed. Respondent supported the impugned orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The 30-year consecutive period under Article 438 of the Code of Communidades refers to the period during which dividends have not been claimed, not the period during which dividends were declared. Non-declaration of dividends does not break the continuity of the non-claim period.

Judgment Excerpts

The Administrator and the Tribunal, have not correctly interpreted the provisions of Article 438 of the Code of the Communidades. The consecutive period of 30 years cannot be calculated since 1977 as the dividends were not declared for the years 1977, 1979, 1980, 1983, 1984 and lastly for the year 1985.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed application under Article 438 on 13.01.2008. Administrator rejected it on 12.11.2009. Petitioner appealed to Administrative Tribunal, which confirmed the order on 14.07.2011. Petitioner then filed writ petition in High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Communidades: Article 438
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Held That Trial Court's Discretionary Order Did Not Suffer from Jurisdictional Error or Perversity.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Administrator's Order Under Article 438 of Code of Communidades — Interpretation of 'Consecutive Years' for Dividend Non-Claim Clarified. The court held that the 30-year consecutive perio...