Search Results for "CPC applicability"

751 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 751 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders of Land Acquisition Authority Setting Aside Reference Orders as Ex-parte. Acquiring Body's Appearance and Filing of Written Statement and Evidence Rendered Reference Orders Not Ex-parte, Contravening Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a batch of eleven writ petitions filed by landowners whose agricultural lands were acquire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that concurrent findings of fact regarding readiness and willingness and limitation cannot be disturbed in second appeal under Section 100 CPC unless perverse.

The present second appeals arise out of a suit for specific performance of a contract for sale of land. The appellants, who are the legal representati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging KERC Order Dated 14.05.2018. The Petitioners, Renewable Energy Companies, Seek to Quash the Regulatory Order.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various renewable energy companies, including Renew Power Limited an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Challenge to Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission Order on Wheeling and Banking Charges for Renewable Energy Generators. The court examined the validity of the order dated 14.05.2018 under the Electricity Act, 2003.

A batch of writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several renewable en...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Reconsiders Validity of Appellate Side Rule on Marathi Translations After Earlier Division Bench Held It Unconstitutional. Larger Bench Examines Whether Litigants Were Heard Before Rule Declared Null and Void Under Article 348.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed by a practicing advocate who was prevented by the High Court Registry from filing a petition without first...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit — Cause of Action Disclosed. Court holds that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC if it discloses a cause of action, even if the claim may ultimately fail on merits.

The judgment pertains to a Notice of Motion filed by defendant No.1 in a suit for specific performance. The defendant sought rejection of the plaint u...