Search Results for "subsidiary facts"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "subsidiary facts"

806 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 806 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Chief Manager Challenging Disciplinary Action for Accepting Forged Bank Guarantee. Reduction in Pay Scale Upheld as Not Disproportionate to Misconduct of Violating CMC Manual Guidelines.

6 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Rajendraprasad Shukla, was working as Chief Manager (Finance) at Western Coalfields Limited (WCL), a subsidiary of Coal India Limited....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition in Commercial Dispute — Appointment of Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court appoints retired judge as sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a Master Service Agreement between parties.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Zanmai Labs Private Limited, filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for SEZ Development — Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Challenge to Notification Under Section 4 and Declaration Under Section 6 Dismissed Due to Delay and Laches and Lack of Locus Standi.

28 Apr 2014

The petitioners, Zuari Industries Limited, Shri A. Prabhugaunker, and Zuari SEZ Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of land by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to ONGC's Decision to Open Price Bid of Technip in Tender for Onshore Terminal. Court holds that deficiencies in technical bid were curable and decision based on Independent External Monitor's recommendation was not arbitrary.

9 May 2014

The Petitioner, KSS Petron Pvt. Ltd., challenged a communication dated 6th January 2014 from Respondent No.1, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ON...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Courier License in Gold Smuggling Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Suspension Order Set Aside as Show Cause Notice Did Not Allege Any Act or Omission by Petitioner Under Courier Regulations, 1998.

12 Oct 2015

The petitioner, TNT India Private Limited, a private limited company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, and a subsidiary of TNT Expres...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Against Defendants Over 'SUNCONTROL' Mark. The Court held that 'SUNCONTROL' is descriptive and not distinctive, and that the plaintiff failed to establish secondary meaning or likelihood of confusion.

12 Jul 2016

The plaintiff, Garware Polyester Limited, filed a suit for trade mark infringement and passing off against 3M Company and 3M India Limited, alleging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

6 Apr 2026

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revision Order in Co-operative Bank Dispute — Petitioner's Rights Restored. The Court held that the revisional authority exceeded its jurisdiction by interfering with a reasoned order of the Assistant Commissioner without proper application of mind.

5 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Sri Vijayachandra, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging an order dated 11.11.2014 passed by the first ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute — Clause 27.4 Held Valid Arbitration Agreement, Third Party Not Bound. The court appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the petitioner and respondents 1 to 4 under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, but dismissed the petition against respondent No.5 who was not a party to the agreement.

11 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Nitesh Urban Development Pvt Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute. Clause 27.4 of Agreement Held Valid Arbitration Agreement, but Third Party Respondent No.5 Cannot Be Referred to Arbitration.

11 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Nitesh Urban Development Pvt Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...

35 36 37 38 39

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)