Search Results for "public performance"

3059 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3059 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition to Restrain Encashment of Bank Guarantee in Contract Dispute — No Concluded Contract Found. Court quashes demand letters and directs status quo, holding that without a work order, there is no concluded contract and invocation is arbitrary.

The petitioner, PG Setty Construction Technology Pvt. Ltd., a construction company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Trial Court's Damages Award in Illegal Termination Suit; Cross-Objection for Higher Damages Also Considered. Judgment Under Section 96 CPC and Order XLI Rule 1 is Delivered After Remand for Quantification.

This case involved the challenge to the termination of a managerial employee in a private limited company. H.R. Thimmappa Gowda joined Goetze (India) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by MIDC in Contract Breach Case — No Binding Contract Without Work Order. Mere acceptance of tender does not create contractual obligations; formal work order essential under tender conditions.

The case involves an appeal by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) against a decree passed in Special Civil Suit No.99/2009, whe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Oral Agreement to Sell Flat. Oral Agreement for Sale of Immovable Property Not Enforceable Due to Lack of Written Contract and Part Performance Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The plaintiff, Nirav Deepak Modi, filed a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement allegedly entered into with defendant No.1, Najoo Behram ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Grounds for Interference Established. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse, and the Petition Was Barred by Limitation.

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside an arbitral ...