Search Results for "project cancellation"

550 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 550 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Mill Worker's Petition Against Cancellation of Allotment Due to Non-Payment. Court Directs MHADA to Accept Payment and Hand Over Possession, Holding That Rejection of Extension Was Not Justified in Peculiar Facts.

The petitioner, Shamrav Dhondiba Kamble, a 76-year-old former mill worker, lost his job due to the 1982 mill strike and resided in his native village....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Premium Paid for FSI Exclusion in Town Planning Case — No Development Commenced, No Benefit Availed. The court held that retention of premium without providing any benefit amounts to unjust enrichment under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, Shri Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Smt. Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15 February 2020...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Slum Land Acquisition as Barred by Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act — Preliminary Issue of Bar of Suit Decided in Favor of Defendant No.5.

The suit was filed by the Plaintiffs seeking a declaration of ownership of a plot of land and challenging its acquisition by the State Government unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Flat Allotment and Possession. Court upholds concurrent findings that appellants failed to prove title or possession, and that the suit was not barred by limitation or the Cooperative Societies Act.

The case involves a second appeal by original defendant nos. 7 and 8 (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Court, Pune, which c...