Search Results for "possession delay"

3713 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3713 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Tenancy Dispute — Purchase Declared Ineffective Due to Tenant's Default in Payment of Instalments. MRT's Condonation of Delay Without Proper Opportunity to Oppose Set Aside.

The case involves agricultural lands owned by the petitioners (landlords) which were let out to the deceased respondent no.1 (tenant). The tenant was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Examines Whether Minister Can Drop Land Acquisition After Award and Dismissal of Landowner’s Challenge. Matter Concerns Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Power of Acquiring Authority to Object.

The petitioner, City & Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO), acting as the New Town's Development Authority under the Maharashtra Regional & Tow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Orders Refund to Homebuyer in Vatika India Next Project - Consumer Protection Act Applies to Plot Allotment Despite Arbitration Clause - Deficiency in Service Established for Delayed Possession

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission allowed a consumer complaint filed by Complainant( s) against Opp.Party(s) for deficiency in servi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Concerning Nursery Exemption in Land Acquisition for Dr. Shivarama Karanth Layout. Petitioner claims exemption under Government Order dated 01-01-1987 for nursery land acquired for layout formation.

Background: The case involves acquisition of land for the formation of a residential layout known as Dr. Shivarama Karanth Layout by the Bangalore Dev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Appeal Against Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Arising from Joint Development MOU; Developer Seeks Amendment to Include Refund Claim After Dismissal of Suit.

The appeal arose from a commercial suit for specific performance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 27.09.2004. The appellant, M/s Whitefiel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SAFEMA Forfeiture Orders — Bank's Mortgage Rights Protected as Prior Encumbrance. The Court held that forfeiture under Section 7 of SAFEMA does not extinguish a prior bona fide mortgage created before the issuance of the show cause notice.

The Petitioner, Development Credit Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12th Mar...