Search Results for "partnership business"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "partnership business"

1779 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1779 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Pronounced Judgment on Writ Petition Against Refusal of Stamp Duty Refund Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Limitation Dispute Under Section 48(3) Due to Correction of Applicant's Name Beyond Six Months.

9 Jan 2023

The writ petition was filed by Freedom City Ventures, a partnership firm, seeking to quash the order dated 21st June 2014 passed by the Inspector Gene...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenant in Bonafide Requirement Case — Landlord's Need for Residential Premises Prevails After 40-Year Litigation. The court affirmed concurrent findings of bonafide requirement under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, dismissing the tenant's petition.

22 Jan 2018

The case involves a long-standing eviction dispute between a landlord, M.K. Mahipalsingh, and a tenant, Messrs. Indian Scientific Glass Industries, a ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in NI Act Dishonour of Cheque Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence and Failure to Draw Statutory Presumptions Under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that the Power of Attorney holder can file complaint and the accused failed to rebut the presumption that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt.

9 Mar 2026

The appellant, Avdhut Finance, a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, through its Power of A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Holding That Alternative Prayer for Specific Performance Is Not Maintainable in Suit for Rescission. Suit for Rescission of Contract Cannot Include Alternative Prayer for Specific Performance Under Specific Relief Act, 1877.

4 Apr 1968

The appellant, Prem Raj, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a contract with the respondent, D.L.F. Housing & Construction Pvt. Ltd., was void and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admits Writ Petition and Grants Interim Stay on Recovery of Unearned Income. Demand of Rs.26.06 Crores Against Tata Communications Alleged to be Based on Erroneous Finding of Land Transfer Due to Change in Shareholding.

1 Dec 2025

The writ petition was filed by Tata Communications Limited (formerly Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited) challenging the order of the Revenue Minister dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Writ Petitions Challenging CIDCO's Refusal to Regularize Building Irregularities under MRTP Act. The Court examined the validity of orders passed under Sections 45 and 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, concerning unauthorized construction and occupation certificate refusal.

11 Jun 2012

The matter involved writ petitions challenging the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited's (CIDCO) rejection of a regular...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Assessee in Income Tax Case — Write-off of Advances and Expenses Held Allowable as Business Loss Under Section 28 of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that amounts advanced to a business associate in the course of business dealings and written off as irrecoverable are deductible as business loss.

9 Jun 2023

The appellant, Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd., a public limited company engaged in manufacturing and trading, filed an appeal under Section 206A of the In...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

14 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications Against Rejection of Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Plea in Suit for Recovery and Declaration. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

19 Aug 2023

The judgment arises from two Civil Revision Applications filed against orders passed by the trial court rejecting applications under Order 7 Rule 11 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Legal Heirs in Arbitration Petitions Under Sections 9 and 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court granted leave to amend pleadings to bring legal heirs of deceased partners on record, dispensing with reverification.

20 Jun 2022

The judgment pertains to four matters: Arbitration Petition No.290 of 2022, Arbitration Petition No.295 of 2022, Arbitration Application No.92 of 2022...

35 36 37 38 39

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)