Search Results for "exclusive marks"

448 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 448 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Child Kidnapping and Murder Case. Conviction Under Sections 302, 364-A, 201 IPC Upheld but Death Penalty Not Warranted Due to Lack of Aggravating Circumstances.

The case arises from the kidnapping and murder of an 11-year-old boy, Yash, on 10 June 2013. The appellant, Santosh Kalwe, was a neighbour residing in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 set aside as prosecution failed to prove last seen theory and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal arises from the conviction of Rajendra Eknath Apugade and Arjun Vasant Falake (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) by the Additional Sessions Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Search Committee Appointment for Vice Chancellor of Pune University. UGC Regulations, 2010 Held Directory, Not Mandatory, for Appointment Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Suresh Patilkhede challenging the appointment of the Search Committee for recommending a panel for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder, Acquits Others in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC sustained for accused who inflicted fatal injuries, while others acquitted for insufficient proof of common intention.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by convicted accused and a criminal application by the State seeking leave to appeal against acqui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Multinational Company in Rent Control Case. Section 3(1)(b) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 exempts premises let to multinational companies from protection of the Act, and concurrent findings of fact are not interfered with under Section 115 CPC.

The applicant, Eloff Hansson (India) Pvt. Ltd., was a tenant in office premises in Mumbai. The respondents, landlords, terminated the tenancy in 1993 ...