Search Results for "examination valuation"

473 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 473 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Order Declining Approval Under Prevention of Corruption Act Due to Non-Application of Mind. The Court held that an order under Section 17A must reflect independent consideration and cannot be based solely on exoneration in a departmental enquiry, directing fresh reconsideration.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a lawyer and social activist challenging an order dated 26-05-2025 passed by the Under Secretary, Depa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeals and Partly Allows Claimants' Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 1,50,000 per Hectare Based on Sale Instances and Potential for Development.

The case involves three appeals arising from a common judgment of the Reference Court dated 17/04/2012 in L.A.C. No.263/2008, concerning compensation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Rate to Rs. 30,000 Per Acre with Statutory Benefits. Court Relies on Sale Deed of Similar Land and Previous Awards to Determine Market Value Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and award dated 26/08/2003 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes TPO Order in Transfer Pricing Adjustment for Demerger Transaction. Held that transfer pricing provisions under Section 92 of Income Tax Act, 1961 do not apply to a demerger approved by High Court where assets and liabilities are transferred at book value without any consideration.

The petitioner, Times Global Broadcasting Company Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Benett, Coleman and Company Ltd (BCCL), was engaged in distributio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal by Goa Housing Board Reducing Land Compensation from ₹300 to ₹150 per sq. metre. Large Agricultural Land Acquisition Requires 50% Deduction for Development Charges Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves an appeal by the Goa Housing Board against the Judgment and Award dated 6th December 2011 passed by the Reference Court under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Eviction Decree in Favour of Court Receiver — Tenancy Rights Not Extinguished by Consent Terms. The Court held that the Court Receiver could not evict the defendants as trespassers without due process, as the consent terms did not terminate their tenancy rights.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 22nd February 2010 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court in S.C.Suit No.1154 of 2000, decreeing the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Reduced from Rs. 200 to Rs. 150 per sq.meter. Comparable Sale Instances of Small Plots Require Deduction for Development When Applied to Large Acquisitions Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Reference Court in Land Reference No. 1 of 1987, which had enhanced the compensation for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) concerning land in Village...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court Holds That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property, and That the Trial Court Erred in Decreeing the Suit Without Proper Consideration of Evidence.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) over agricultural land. Th...