Search Results for "authorised signatory"

594 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 594 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Condonation of Delay in Land Acquisition Appeal Filed Beyond 120 Days Under 2013 Act. Issue of Whether Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Section 74(1) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 Remains to be Decided.

The Deputy Commissioner and Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bengaluru (SLAO) filed an appeal under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Administrator’s Report for Recovery of Diverted Estate Assets in Testamentary Suit. Court Appointed Administrator Seeks Directions Against Defendant for Unauthorized Diversion of Deceased’s Funds to Various Entities.

The matter concerned the administration of the estate of Purvez Burjor Dalal, who died in Mumbai on 7 December 2011. A testamentary suit was institute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Validity of RERA Order on Complaint Maintainability and Project Exemption. The Court Examines Whether a Project with Occupancy Certificate is Exempt from Registration Under Rule 4 of Karnataka Real Estate Rules.

The petitioner, a real estate promoter, challenged an order of the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority which rejected its application seeking d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule Nisi in Cyber Fraud Case Involving Unauthorized Withdrawals of Rs. 38.04 Lakh. Petitioner Claims Banks Breached RBI Guidelines on Internet Banking and Failed to Reverse Fraudulent Transactions.

The petitioner, a freelancer in business consultancy, maintained savings and current accounts with HDFC Bank since 2011 and 2016 respectively. On 14 J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Interception Orders of Petitioner in Indian Telegraph Act Case Due to Absence of Public Emergency or Interest of Public Safety. The Court Held That Telephone Interception Without Proper Statutory Compliance Violates Right to Privacy and Intercepted Material Must Be Destroyed.

The petitioner, a businessman, challenged three orders dated 29 October 2009, 18 December 2009, and 24 February 2010, by which his telephone calls wer...