KAHC010371442012_1
20 Apr 2023The judgment pertains to an appeal by an insurance company against a compensation award and a cross-objection by claimants seeking enhancement. The de...
Search Results for "Rule 222"
665 result(s) found
Found 665 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Hostile Witness Testimony. Section 106 of Evidence Act Applied to Shift Burden on Accused to Explain Injuries in Shared Household.
3 May 2024The appeal arises from a conviction under Section 302 IPC for the murder of the appellant's wife, Saira. The marriage was in 1982, and they had a daug...
- 321
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition of Structures by Nashik Municipal Corporation Without Proper Notice and Hearing. Demolition Without Prior Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 53A of MRTP Act and Section 169 of MMC Act.
12 Sep 2024The judgment involves a group of writ petitions filed by individuals and businesses challenging the demolition of their structures by the Nashik Munic...
- 571
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in CRPF Constable Dismissal Case, Upholding Termination for Concealment of Criminal Case. Termination was justified under Rule 5(1) of Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965, as appellant suppressed pending criminal case in verification form, despite subsequent acquittal, in a disciplined paramilitary force.
26 Sep 2022The dispute arose from the termination of a Constable in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) for concealing information about a pending criminal c...
- 513
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Applications for Directions in Karnataka Reservation Case. No Fresh Cause of Action Arises from Implementation of Reservation Act 2018 After Final Judgment.
19 Mar 2020The Supreme Court dismissed three miscellaneous applications filed by 277 applicants seeking directions for the implementation of the Karnataka Extens...
- 181
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Penalty and Royalty for Unauthorized Excavation of Earth During Sewerage Pipeline Project. Revenue Officials' Demand Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Quashed as Excavation Was Incidental to Public Works Contract and Not for Commercial Use.
28 Mar 2024The petitioners, M/s. Ramky Infrastructure Ltd. and its shareholder, challenged the imposition of penalty and royalty by revenue officials under Secti...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Despite Third Child Born After Cut-off Date — Government Resolution Clause E Held Inapplicable to Children Born Before 31.12.2001. The court interpreted Clause E of the Government Resolution dated 28.03.2001 as prospective, not disqualifying families with a third child born before 31.12.2001.
27 Jul 2023The petitioners, Sunita Gaikwad (widow) and Ashish Gaikwad (son), sought compassionate appointment after the death of Dinesh Gaikwad, an employee of Z...
- 109
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).
7 Jul 2022The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...
- 88
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Categorization Under 1992 Guidelines for Premature Release of Life Convict in Murder During Robbery Case. Petitioner's Offence of Murder During Robbery Correctly Categorized Under Category 5(a) of the 1992 Guidelines, Which Superseded the 1978 Guidelines.
2 May 2011The petitioner, Harjeetsingh Niranjansingh Jabbal, was convicted under Sections 302 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code for murder committed during a rob...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Cancellation of Vehicle Registration in Customs Duty Evasion Case — Petitioner Not a Bona Fide Purchaser Without Notice. Registration Cancellation Under Section 55(5) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Upheld as Vehicle Was Fraudulently Imported Availing Customs Duty Exemption for Diplomatic Officer.
2 Dec 2025The petitioner, Imran Humayun Chandiwala, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 9 September ...
- 95
