APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.495 OF 2015
8 Mar 2016The judgment under consideration pertains to four appeals arising from a property dispute involving final plot no.267 of Town Planning Scheme IV, Mahi...
Search Results for "Plaint averments"
1981 result(s) found
Found 1981 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Upholding Rejection of Plaint for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Suit Notices Under MMC Act and MCS Act. Failure to Serve Notice Under Section 527 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 and Section 164 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 on Public Authorities Renders Plaint Liable for Rejection Under Order 11 Rule 7(d) CPC.
25 Oct 2013The appellants, Noor Mohd. Shami Shaikh and another, filed First Appeals against a common order dated 6.2.2013 passed by the City Civil Judge, Mumbai,...
- 116
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Property Dispute — Rejection of Plaint Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Upheld. Court holds that the plaint discloses a cause of action and the suit is not barred by limitation, as the plaintiffs claimed possession based on their father's death prior to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
9 Dec 2016The petitioners (defendants in the trial court) filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challengi...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Easement Rights Dispute. Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Application Dismissed as Plaint Discloses Triable Issues Regarding Existence of Road and Easement of Necessity.
29 Apr 2014The petitioner, Goa Industrial Development Corporation, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 CPC challenging an order dated 3.3.2011 p...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Pecuniary Jurisdiction in Property Suit — Valuation Based on Market Value Determines Forum. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Over Non-Agricultural Property Must Be Valued Under Section 6 of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959; Plaintiffs Directed to Pay Deficit Court Fees.
13 Apr 2015The case involves a challenge to an order dated 28 October 2014 passed by the 16th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Pune, which held that the court...
- 154
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Setting Aside of Process in Defamation Case — Reinstates Complaint Under Section 500 IPC Against Advocate for Alleged Defamatory Statements in Legal Notice. Legal Notice Sent to Complainant and Others Constitutes Publication for Defamation; Prima Facie Case Exists.
13 Apr 2018The revision applicant, Rajendra Kumar Shahani, was the original complainant in a criminal complaint alleging defamation under Section 500 IPC against...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Copyright Infringement Case Over Hair Colour Product Trade Dress. L'Oreal's artistic work in label/trade dress held entitled to protection against alleged imitation by Henkel.
16 Aug 2005The plaintiffs, L'Oreal India Pvt. Ltd. and its parent company, filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants, Henkel Marketing I...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Limitation is a Mixed Question of Law and Facts Not Decided at Threshold Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
21 Feb 2014The present civil revision application was filed by the original defendant No.1 in Regular Civil Suit No.1600/2012 pending before the 16th Civil Judge...
- 115
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Partition Appeal for Lack of Evidence of Joint Family Property. Court holds that plaintiffs failed to prove that suit properties were ancestral joint family properties, and the suit was barred by limitation and res judicata.
26 Jul 2024The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 30.01.2018 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Kolar, in O.S. No. 42/2012, dismissing the suit for pa...
- 138
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Motion to Set Aside Arrest of Vessel in Admiralty Suit: Arrest of M.V. Rainbow Ace Challenged on Ground of Non-Establishment of Common Beneficial Ownership Between Vessel Owner and Defaulting Charterer. Defendant Vessel Owner Asserts No Common Beneficial Ownership with Charterer, Seeking to Vacate Ex-Parte Arrest Order in Maritime Claim for Damages Under Voyage Charterparty.
6 May 2013In the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Admiralty and Vice Admiralty jurisdiction, the applicant, owner of the vessel M.V. Rainbow Ace, filed a not...
- 30
