Search Results for "Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1949"

392 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 392 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Lokayukta Report for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Grant Hearing Before Adverse Recommendations Against Government Officers. Section 10 of Maharashtra Lokayukta and Upa-Lokayuktas Act, 1971 Requires Opportunity of Hearing Before Making Report.

The petitioners, officers of the Government of Maharashtra, challenged the report/recommendation of the Hon'ble Lokayukta dated 26 September 2011 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Government Officers Challenging Lokayukta Report for Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Grant Hearing Under Section 10 of Maharashtra Lokayukta Act, 1971 Renders Report Unsustainable.

The petitioners, officers of the Government of Maharashtra, challenged the report/recommendation of the Hon'ble Lokayukta dated 26 September 2011 in c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Eviction Case for Unlawful Subletting and Non-User of Premises. Tenants failed to show error apparent on face of record in revision order confirming eviction decree under Bombay Rent Act.

The petitioners, who were the defendants in the original eviction suit, filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Refund of Rs.56 Crore Service Tax Deposit Retained Without Authority of Law. Petitioner Bank's deposit made under protest to buy peace on interchange income cannot be retained without show cause notice or adjudication order.

The petitioner, The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the retent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Canceling Cinema License for Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Speaking Order. Appellate Authority Under Section 8A of Bombay Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1953 Cannot Cancel License Without Recording Findings on Grounds Under Section 6.

The petitioners, Deepak Joshi and the legal representatives of Ravi K. Appu, challenged an order dated 28.01.1999 passed by the State Minister (Home),...