Search Results for "Limitation Act, 1908"

1858 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1858 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Advance Ruling on India-UAE DTAA and Revocable Trust Taxation. Writ Petitions Concern Taxability of Income from Indian Investments by UAE-Owned Trust Under Sections 61 and 63 of Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 24 of India-UAE Tax Treaty.

The matter before the Bombay High Court consisted of two writ petitions filed by Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) and Equity Trust (Jersey) Limit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Order 7 Rule 11 Application in Suit for Recovery — Limitation is a Mixed Question of Fact and Law Not Decided at Threshold. Plaint Averments Show Cause of Action Arose in 2010, Suit Filed Within Three Years, Not Barred by Limitation.

The applicants (original defendants) filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Rejection of Plaint in Recovery Suit as Time-Barred Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Claim for Damages for Short Delivery of Goods Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period Under Article 11 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appeal was filed by Reliance Industries Limited against the order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panvel, dated 21/3/1998, rejecting the plai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal Against High Court's Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Dispute Involves Interpretation of Contractual Notice Requirement as Condition Precedent and Applicability of Waiver and Estoppel in EPC Contract.

The dispute arose from multiple Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) agreements between SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation (con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Employee Convicted of Theft While Under Suspension — Limitation Bar Applied for Delayed Challenge. The Court held that a removal order under Rule 19(i) of CCS (CCA) Rules is not a continuing wrong and delay of 13 years cannot be condoned without sufficient cause.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that concurrent findings of fact regarding readiness and willingness and limitation cannot be disturbed in second appeal under Section 100 CPC unless perverse.

The present second appeals arise out of a suit for specific performance of a contract for sale of land. The appellants, who are the legal representati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Order 7 Rule 11 Application in Suit for Recovery. Limitation Period for Suit Based on Oral Agreement Runs from Date of Refusal to Pay, Not from Date of Knowledge of Sale Deeds.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the defendants (applicants) challenging the order of the trial court rejecting their applicati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revision Petition in Arbitration Dispute Under Bihar Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal Act, 2008 - Reference Not Barred by Limitation as Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963 Applies and Tribunal Had Power to Extend Period Under Section 18 of the 2008 Act.

The dispute originated from a works contract for drainage work in an industrial area, awarded by the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority to th...