Search Results for "IPC Section 376"

1220 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1220 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Delay in FIR Led to Benefit of Doubt for Accused Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and SC/ST Act.

The State of Gujarat filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 10.01....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Atrocities Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Alleged Rape of Married Woman Fails as Prosecution Witnesses Contradict Each Other and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Sexual Assault Under Section 376 IPC and SC/ST Act.

The appellant, Bandu Hasan Tamobli, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge at Karad in Sessions Case No.56 of 2000 for offences under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Rape Case Due to Compromise and Marriage — Petitioner and Respondent No.2 Married and Living Together, No Coercion Alleged. FIR under Sections 376(2)(n), 420 and 312 IPC Quashed as Continuation Would Be Abuse of Process.

The petitioner, Ravindra Laxman Ghogardare, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad seeking quashing of FIR No. I266...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Consensual Relationship and Lack of Evidence of Promise to Marry. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC and POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix was a consenting minor and no false promise of marriage established.

The appellant, Prashant Ramchandra Kasarkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Yavatmal in Special (POCSO) Case 63/2017 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Victim's Age. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child under POCSO Act.

The appellant, Prashant Korwate, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Section 376(1) IPC read with Section 3 punishable ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Delay in FIR and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ningappa S/o Basappa Cheliwadi, was convicted by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Gulbarga, in SC 125/2009 for the offence of rape un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Benefit of Doubt. Conviction under Sections 363, 366-A, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Lahu Bhausaheb Sonwane, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur, for offences under Sections 363, 366-A, and 376 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction for Sexual Assault of Deaf and Dumb Minor Set Aside as Medical and Forensic Evidence Did Not Support Prosecution Case.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Suresh Surwade for offences under Sections 452 and 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Secti...