Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Rape Case Due to Compromise and Marriage — Petitioner and Respondent No.2 Married and Living Together, No Coercion Alleged. FIR under Sections 376(2)(n), 420 and 312 IPC Quashed as Continuation Would Be Abuse of Process.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 123
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ravindra Laxman Ghogardare, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad seeking quashing of FIR No. I266/2018 registered at Kotwali Police Station, Ahmednagar for offences under Sections 376(2)(n), 420 and 312 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR was lodged by respondent no.2, Sanjivani Ramdas Duche, alleging that the petitioner had sexual relations with her on the promise of marriage and later refused to marry her, and also caused her to miscarry. During the pendency of the petition, the parties entered into a compromise and got married. They were living together as husband and wife. The court considered the submissions of the advocates for both sides and the fact that the parties had amicably settled the dispute. The court noted that the continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law. The court exercised its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Quashing of FIR - Compromise in Non-Compoundable Offences - Inherent Powers under Section 482 CrPC - FIR registered for offences under Sections 376(2)(n), 420 and 312 IPC - Parties married and living together, no coercion alleged - Held that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law, FIR quashed (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR registered for offences under Sections 376(2)(n), 420 and 312 of the Indian Penal Code should be quashed in view of the compromise between the parties and the subsequent marriage of the petitioner and respondent no.2.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. FIR No. I266/2018 registered with Kotwali Police Station, Ahmednagar for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 420 and 312 of the Indian Penal Code and all consequential proceedings are quashed and set aside.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Compromise in non-compoundable offences
  • Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC
  • Prima facie case
  • Rape
  • Cheating
  • Causing miscarriage
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (01) 156

Criminal Writ Petition No.1810 of 2018

2019-02-05

S.S. Shinde, R.G. Avachat

Mr. D.C. Awari for Petitioner, Mr. S.B. Joshi APP for Respondent/State, Mr. R.C. Bora holding for Mr. R.P. Bidwe for respondent no.2

Ravindra Laxman Ghogardare

State of Maharashtra, Miss Sanjivani Ramdas Duche

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition for quashing of FIR

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. I266/2018 registered at Kotwali Police Station, Ahmednagar for offences under Sections 376(2)(n), 420 and 312 IPC

Filing Reason

Allegations of rape on promise of marriage, cheating, and causing miscarriage

Issues

Whether the FIR should be quashed in view of the compromise and marriage between the parties

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the parties have compromised and married, and continuation of proceedings would be abuse of process. Respondent no.2 did not oppose the quashing.

Ratio Decidendi

When the parties have amicably settled the dispute and are living together as husband and wife, continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law, warranting quashing of FIR under inherent powers.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, and heard finally with the consent of the parties. This Petition is filed praying therein to quash and set aside the FIR vide Crime No. I266/2018, registered with Kotwali Police Station, Ahmednagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 376 (2) (n), 420 and 312 of the Indian Penal Code. In brief, it is alleged in the FIR by respondent no.2 that, the petitioner had sexual relations with her on the promise of marriage and later refused to marry her, and also caused her to miscarry. The petition is allowed.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No.1810 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad seeking quashing of FIR. The petition was reserved on 31.01.2019 and pronounced on 05.02.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 376(2)(n), 420, 312
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in U.P. Trade Tax Act Case on State Development Tax Adjustment. Court upheld High Court's decision that assessees are entitled to adjust State Development Tax within monetary limits specified in eligibility certificate...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Company in Consumer Protection Case and Remands to NCDRC for Merits Decision. The Court held that deposit of surplus funds in a fixed deposit by a company does not automatically constitute commercial purpose under Secti...