APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 54 OF 2012
12 Mar 2015The matter involved two appeals from orders arising out of Special Civil Suit No.2/2012 pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Bicholim. The...
Search Results for "Commercial Division jurisdiction"
3046 result(s) found
Found 3046 result(s)
High Court
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION(L) NO. 6451 OF 2020
16 Mar 2022The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Commercial Division, pronounced judgment on 16 March 2022 in a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitrat...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Jurisdictional Objection in Foreign Award Enforcement — Implied Exclusion of Part I of Arbitration Act Upheld. Parties' choice of London arbitration and English law impliedly excludes Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, including section 42, so prior section 34 application in Gujarat does not bar Bombay High Court from hearing enforcement petition under section 48.
5 Oct 2011The petitioner, Eitzen Bulk A/S, filed a petition under section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the Bombay High Court seeking...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Railway Employee for Theft of Parcels — Natural Justice Violation Claim Rejected. Disciplinary proceedings valid despite non-supply of inquiry report as employee failed to show prejudice.
4 Dec 2018The judgment concerns two cross writ petitions arising from disciplinary proceedings against V.M. Shukla, a Parcel Clerk employed by Central Railway, ...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.
23 Aug 2013The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of a company application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a permanent stay of t...
- 117
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute, Upholds Plausible Contract Interpretation. High Court Exceeded Section 37 Jurisdiction by Substituting Its Own Construction of Coal Mining and Delivery Agreement.
27 May 2019The dispute arose from a Coal Mining and Delivery Agreement (CMDA) executed on 16.07.2008 between Parsa Kente Collieries Limited (appellant) and Rajas...
- 476
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Cancellation of Trademark 'PAXIL' for Non-Use Under Section 47 of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Petitioner's Global Reputation and Prior Use Established 'Person Aggrieved' Status.
24 Apr 2026The Petitioner, Glaxo Group Limited, a global pharmaceutical company, filed a petition under Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 seeking cancellat...
- 152
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Removal of Assets in Commercial Suit Despite Arbitration Clause — Interim Relief Granted Under Order 39 CPC. Trial Court Directed to Decide Interim Application on Merits Without Considering Maintainability Based on Arbitration Clause.
7 Aug 2019The petitioner, INOX Leisure Limited, filed a commercial suit against Indo Pacific Projects Limited seeking recovery of security deposit and permissio...
- 104
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Restores POCSO and IT Act Charges in Child Pornography Case — High Court Erred in Quashing Chargesheet Without Considering Presumption of Culpable Mental State. Possession of Child Pornographic Material, Even Without Intent to Distribute, Constitutes an Offence Under Section 15(1) of POCSO and Section 67B of IT Act.
23 Sep 2024The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Just Rights for Children Alliance and another child rights organization against the judgment of the Mad...
- 1328
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Commercial Appeal Against Refusal to Amend Arbitration Petition — Amendment Sought to Challenge Arbitral Award as Nullity Rejected as Time-Barred and Without Merit. The Court held that an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not maintainable against an order refusing amendment of a petition, and the amendment was rightly rejected as it was sought after the limitation period had expired.
7 Apr 2017The case involves a Commercial Appeal filed by Zee Sports Ltd. (now Zee Digital Convergance Ltd.) against Nimbus Media Pte. Ltd. under Section 37 of t...
- 63
