KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
Search Results for "transport"
4459 result(s) found
Found 4459 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court pronounces judgment on Letters Patent appeals in oppression and mismanagement case under Companies Act, 1956 — dispute over diversion of Contship agency business. The Court examined whether directors' diversion of business opportunity amounted to oppression and breach of fiduciary duty under Sections 397, 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 88 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882.
31 Mar 2006The appeals arose from a dispute between the Puri Group and the Sippy Group, both holding equal shares and equal directorships in two private Indian s...
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeal by Truck Owner Against MACT Award Discharging Insurer in Motor Accident Claims. Main issue is whether insurance company is liable for compensation despite breach of policy condition regarding carriage of passengers in a goods vehicle under Motor Vehicles Act.
28 Jun 2010The appeal arises from a motor accident that occurred on 27 April 1985 near village Apegaon. Truck No. MWN 581, driven by Rajendra Deshmukh, was carry...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Mechanical Rejection of Rehabilitation Claims Under National Highways Act. The Court held that the provisions of the First, Second, and Third Schedules of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 apply to land acquisition under the National Highways Act, 1956, and the Competent Authority must individually assess each claimant's entitlement to rehabilitation and resettlement benefits.
25 Oct 2024This batch of writ petitions involved a common question of law: whether and how the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in L...
- 685
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.
18 Nov 2024The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...
- 2212
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Modifies National Green Tribunal Order on Pollution Control at Inland Container Depot to Balance Environmental and Logistical Concerns. The Court Directed a Phased Approach to Cleaner Fuels and Optimal Utilization of Alternative Depots, Emphasizing the Right to Pollution-Free Environment Under Article 21 of the Constitution.
11 Jan 2024The dispute originated from an original application filed by a former Executive Director of the Central Warehousing Corporation before the National Gr...
- 194
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part in Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Case — Resignation Not Convertible to Voluntary Retirement; Gratuity Payable Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The Court held that voluntary retirement requires acceptance by the appointing authority and pending disciplinary proceedings justify non-acceptance; resignation cannot be converted to voluntary retirement after acceptance and receipt of benefits.
15 Apr 2020The case involves an appeal by the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation against a High Court order directing them to treat the respondent's dece...
- 254
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of DTC Employee Seeking Pension for Lack of Minimum Qualifying Service. Leave Without Pay Period Excluded from Pensionable Service Under Rule 21 of Central Civil Services Pension Rules, 1972.
22 Oct 2019The appellant, Karan Singh, was a conductor with the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC). He was appointed as a monthly rate conductor w.e.f. 27th Novem...
- 177
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application Under Section 264 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Failure to Consider Petitioner's Objections and Violation of Principles of Natural Justice. The Assessing Officer's order under Section 195 was set aside for non-consideration of objections and lack of speaking order, and the revisional authority's order under Section 264 was quashed for not remedying the defect.
28 Feb 2022The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited, a public limited company and engineering conglomerate, entered into a contract with Oil and Natural Gas Corpo...
- 53
