Search Results for "test identification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "test identification"

1258 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1258 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Magistrate to Order Voice Sample of Accused in Criminal Investigation. Article 20(3) Does Not Bar Compelled Voice Sample as It Is Not Testimonial Evidence Under Section 53 CrPC.

2 Aug 2019

The case arises from an FIR lodged on 7th December 2009 at Sadar Bazar Police Station, Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, alleging that Dhoom Singh and appell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Evidence Identifying Driver. Conviction under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act Quashed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Applicant Was Driving the Offending Tempo.

29 Nov 2013

The applicant, Ramnath Yashwant Gholap, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Ashti, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds CAT Order Directing Consideration of Disabled Candidate for Civil Services — Failure to Provide Scribe for Written Examination Violates Rights Under Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. The court held that the denial of a scribe to a visually impaired candidate amounts to discrimination and violates Section 39 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995.

27 Oct 2014

The Union of India filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12.12.2013 passed by the C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Contradictions in Prosecution Version. Conviction Under Sections 148, 302/149 and 324/149 Indian Penal Code, 1860 Set Aside as Dying Declaration Was Unreliable and Witness Testimony Contradictory.

12 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court considered an appeal challenging the conviction and life imprisonment sentence imposed on the appellants for murder under Sections 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove homicidal death and chain of circumstances was incomplete.

29 Jun 2022

The appellant, Parvez Farukh Dalvi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon, Raigad for the murder of his wife Khairunisa and their so...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Charge Sheet Against Five Applicants in Rioting and Arson Case Due to Lack of Evidence and False Implication. Investigating Officer Admitted No Material Against Some Applicants and Names Not in Witness Statements, Leading to Quashing Under Section 482 CrPC.

5 Aug 2011

The applicants, five individuals, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Article 226 of the Consti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC set aside as testimony of prosecutrix failed to inspire confidence.

27 Mar 2019

The case involves two appeals filed by Samundersing Mahipal Sing and Rajnishkumar Sureshchandra Kumar against their conviction by the Additional Sessi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Injured Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eye-witness's statement was recorded after he was declared unfit for statement and his testimony suffered from material contradictions.

3 Mar 2022

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of four appellants (Sanjay Datta Shinde, Sanjay Prakash Bachalkar, Prathmesh alias Nana Ankush Rode...

34 35 36 37 38

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)