Bombay High Court Quashes Charge Sheet Against Five Applicants in Rioting and Arson Case Due to Lack of Evidence and False Implication. Investigating Officer Admitted No Material Against Some Applicants and Names Not in Witness Statements, Leading to Quashing Under Section 482 CrPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 25
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants, five individuals, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of Charge Sheet No.151 of 2009 for alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 436, 427, 325, 324, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The case arose from FIRs registered at Mangrupir Police Station. The applicants contended that they were deliberately and falsely implicated without any acceptable evidence. The investigating officer, in an affidavit dated 23.4.2010, admitted that there was no case against applicant nos. 1 to 3 and no material was collected against them. The court noted that the names of the applicants did not appear in the statements of alleged eye-witnesses, and the investigating officer failed to conduct a test identification parade. The court observed that the material in the charge sheet appeared nugatory on its face value. The court held that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law and quashed the charge sheet against all five applicants.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of Charge Sheet - Section 482 CrPC - Inherent Powers - The High Court quashed the charge sheet against applicants where the investigating officer admitted no material was collected against applicant nos. 1 to 3 and the names of applicants did not appear in witness statements. Held that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law (Paras 4-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the charge sheet against the applicants should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC when there is no material evidence against them and the investigating officer admitted no case against some applicants.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and quashed Charge Sheet No.151 of 2009 against all five applicants.

Law Points

  • Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC
  • Quashing of charge sheet for lack of evidence
  • False implication
  • Test identification parade
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (08) 147

Criminal Application No.317 of 2010

2011-08-05

A.P. Bhangale

Shri. P.C. Madkholkar for Applicants, Shri. A.S. Parihar for Respondent/State

Faruqu s/o. Abdul Jahura, Abdul Aziz s/o. Abdul Jahura, Abdul Javed s/o. Abdul Jahura, Mohd. Iftequar s/o. Abdul Jabbar, Abdul Rafiq s/o. Abdul Salam

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of charge sheet.

Remedy Sought

Quashing and setting aside of Charge Sheet No.151 of 2009 for offences under IPC.

Filing Reason

Applicants alleged deliberate and false implication without evidence; investigating officer admitted no material against some applicants.

Previous Decisions

On 25.10.2010, the court noted the investigating officer's affidavit admitting no case against applicant nos. 1 to 3.

Issues

Whether the charge sheet should be quashed when the investigating officer admits no material against some applicants and names do not appear in witness statements.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued they were falsely implicated without evidence; names not in witness statements; no test identification parade held. State initially admitted no case against applicant nos. 1 to 3 but sought time to file additional affidavit, which was not filed.

Ratio Decidendi

Where the investigating officer admits no material is collected against the accused and the names of the accused do not appear in witness statements, continuing prosecution would be an abuse of process of law, warranting quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

that so far as the allegations against the applicant nos. 1 to 3 are concerned, the non-applicant fairly admits that there is no case nor investigating Officer was able to collect material against the applicant nos. 1 to 3. The names of the applicants did not really figure in the statements of so-called eye witnesses... the investigating Officer did not bother to hold test identification parade.

Procedural History

Application filed under Section 482 CrPC. On 25.10.2010, court noted affidavit of PSI admitting no case against applicant nos. 1 to 3. State sought time on multiple dates to file additional affidavit but failed. Court heard arguments and allowed the application on 5.8.2011.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 147, 148, 149, 436, 427, 325, 324, 504, 506
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Holds Court Fee on Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Payable Under Article 4 of Schedule I of Maharashtra Court Fees Act. Appeal from order under Section 34 is treated as appeal from decree, requiring ad valorem court fee o...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Charge Sheet Against Five Applicants in Rioting and Arson Case Due to Lack of Evidence and False Implication. Investigating Officer Admitted No Material Against Some Applicants and Names Not in Witness Statements, Leading to...