Search Results for "taxable person"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "taxable person"

651 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 651 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case for Pharmaceutical Freebies. Expenses on Gifting Freebies to Medical Practitioners Are Deductible Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961, as Indian Medical Council Regulations Only Prohibit Acceptance, Not Gifting, Under Explanation 1.

22 Feb 2022

The dispute involved a pharmaceutical company, referred to as Apex, appealing against a High Court judgment that upheld orders disallowing part of its...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit — Holds That High Court Erred in Dismissing Suit on Grounds Not Raised in Pleadings and Without Considering Documentary Evidence. The Court restored the decree for recovery of Rs.96,41,765.31 with interest at 15% per annum from the date of suit till payment.

16 Dec 2021

The appellant, M/s Star Paper Mills Limited, filed a suit for recovery of Rs.96,41,765.31 against the respondents, M/s Beharilal Madanlal Jaipuria Ltd...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case: Investment in Shares of Private Company for Acquiring Control Held as Capital Asset, Not Stock-in-Trade. Shares held for 31 months with transfer restrictions cannot be treated as trading asset under Income Tax Act, 1961.

6 Sep 2013

The appellant, Accra Investments Private Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 25 April 2012 of...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in GST Case — Assignment of Leasehold Rights Not a Supply of Service. Transfer of leasehold rights in land by way of assignment is not a supply of service under Section 7(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, as it constitutes a transfer of title in goods or an interest in immovable property, not a service.

27 Jan 2026

The petitioner, M/s Jubilee Engineers, was allotted a plot of land by the Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC) on a 99-year lease startin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cenvat Credit on Input Services for Sugar Manufacturing Upheld. Transportation of Sugarcane from Farm to Factory Gate Held as Input Service Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

5 Oct 2015

The Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs, Belgaum) appealed against the Final Order No.20105/2014 dated 28.1.2014 passed by the CESTAT, Ba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Revision Order in FCCB Capital Gains Case; Cost of Acquisition Dispute Between FCCB Scheme and Section 49(2A) of Income-tax Act Examined. Revenue Relied on Section 49(2A) While Petitioner Invoked Clause 7(4) of the 1993 Scheme.

27 Mar 2019

The writ petition under Article 226 was filed before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 29 March 2018 passed by the Commissioner of Inco...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Upholds Addition Under Section 68 for Unexplained Share Capital. Assessee Failed to Prove Identity, Creditworthiness, and Genuineness of Investor Companies Despite Receiving Share Premium at Rs. 190 per Share.

1 Jan 2019

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Delhi High Court in an income tax appeal concerning the assessment year 2009-10. The respondent-asses...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Share Capital/Premium Case — Assessee Failed to Prove Identity, Creditworthiness, and Genuineness of Investors Under Section 68 of Income Tax Act. The onus under Section 68 is on the assessee to establish the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions; mere production of documents is insufficient when investor companies are non-existent or unresponsive.

1 Jan 2019

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Delhi High Court in an income tax appeal concerning the assessment year 2009-10. The respondent-asses...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Policy Circulars in SEIS Benefits Case — Circulars Imposing Additional Conditions for Service Providers Held Ultra Vires. Shipping Agent Entitled to SEIS Benefits as Service Provider Under Foreign Trade Policy.

9 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Atlantic Shipping Private Limited, a shipping agent providing port services and logistical support to foreign clients, challenged the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in Capital Gains Tax Case — Transfer of Shares of Foreign Company Not Taxable in India. Shares of a Bermuda company transferred outside India do not constitute transfer of a capital asset situated in India under Section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

18 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Techpac Holdings Ltd., a company incorporated in Bermuda, challenged an assessment order dated 25th March 2013 passed by the Deputy Co...

34 35 36 37 38

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)