Bombay High Court Hears Group of Writ Petitions for Quashing of Communication and Remand. Petitions Related to Plot Numbers in Survey No. 198 A/2, Village Kargaon, and Rule Made Returnable Forthwith.
1 Aug 2017...
Search Results for "locality not specified"
557 result(s) found
Found 557 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Lessee's Appeal in Agricultural Lease Dispute, Holding Frustration Doctrine Requires Property Destruction or Permanent Unfitness. Doctrine of frustration under Section 56 of Contract Act does not apply to agricultural lease where land was not destroyed but lessee migrated due to partition; principle under Section 108(e) Transfer of Property Act applied.
1 Mar 1968The dispute arose from an agricultural lease in undivided Punjab. The appellant, Raja Dhruv Dev Chand, obtained a lease of agricultural land and carri...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proper Verification of In-Camera Statements. Detention order under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act set aside as detaining authority failed to verify in-camera statements and did not consider that the alleged incident was a public agitation.
21 Apr 2023The petitioner, Avinash @ Balu Atmaram More, challenged his detention order dated 07-06-2022 passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention o...
- 63
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petitions in Preventive Detention Case Due to Irrelevant and Vague Grounds. Detention Under Preventive Detention Act Invalidated as Assaults on Solitary Individuals Do Not Constitute Disturbance of Public Order and Vague Grounds Violate Article 22(5) of Constitution.
7 Nov 1968This was a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution for a writ of habeas corpus filed by thirty persons detained under orders passed by the ...
- 19
High Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Mumbai Municipal Corporation's Plea for Extension of Time to Close Illegal Dumping Sites Due to Persistent Non-Compliance with MSW Rules. Non-Compliance Justified Imposition of Restrictions on New Construction Permissions to Enforce Environmental Obligations.
29 Feb 2016The judgment arises from a civil application filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai in a disposed of Public Interest Litigation (PIL No....
- 20
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Stays Circular Imposing Ban on Ferocious Dog Breeds; Union of India Directed to Conduct Stakeholder Consultation Before Enforcement
10 Apr 2024The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by two individuals, a dog breeder and a dog owner, challenging a circular dated 12-0...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order Against Accused in Gambling Cases — Acts Disruptive of Law and Order, Not Public Order. Offences under Section 65(D) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 and Section 12 of Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 do not affect public order as they are directed against individuals and do not disturb even tempo of community life.
6 Oct 2023The petitioner, Jumma @ Munna Burhan Hiriwale, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlor...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act for Dangerous Person. Detention Order Based on Past Criminal Activities and In-Camera Statements Upheld as Valid Under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons and Video Pirates Act, 1981.
21 Oct 2010The petitioner, brother of the detenue Surendra @ Surya Daulat Desai, challenged a detention order dated 15th March 2010 issued by the Commissioner of...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Irrigation Project — Acquisition Proceedings Quashed for Non-Compliance with Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Make Award Within Two Years from Declaration Under Section 6 Renders Proceedings Lapsed.
6 Mar 2017The petitioner, Smt. Nilima Mahesh Bhole, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking quashment of land acquisition ...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act, 2006 as Constitutionally Valid. Levy of fire prevention fee under Section 12 is a fee, not a tax, and the Act is within legislative competence.
5 Dec 2015The petitioners, Vidarbha Taxpayers Association and a citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of the Mahar...
- 83
