Search Results for "lease purpose"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "lease purpose"

2517 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2517 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand on Sub-Lease of Multiplex — Lease Premium Not Part of Consideration for Sub-Lease Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. The Court held that the expression 'consideration for the sub-lease' in Article 35(a) of Schedule I of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 refers only to the consideration moving from the sub-lessee to the sub-lessor, and not the premium paid by the original lessee to the lessor.

9 Jul 2014

The petitioner, CR Retail Malls (India) Limited, challenged an order dated 21 March 2013 passed by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Maharashtr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Defendant's Appeal in License vs. Tenancy Dispute — Written License Agreement Governs Relationship. Court Holds That Defendant Failed to Prove Oral Tenancy, and Civil Court Has Jurisdiction.

17 Mar 2006

The case involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Mrs. Rosario Boventura Fernandes, and the defendant, Shri Indrakant Shankar Mambro, over a parcel o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax TDS Case — Liquor Vendors Are Not 'Buyers' Under Section 206C of Income Tax Act, 1961. Court holds that excise contractors acquiring arrack under state-controlled system are excluded from definition of 'buyer' under Explanation (a)(iii) of Section 206C.

12 Oct 2023

The appeal arose from a dispute under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning tax collection at source on the sale of alcoholic liquor. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint and Grants Temporary Injunction in Property Dispute — Concurrent Orders of Courts Below Set Aside. Amendment Sought to Correct Description of Suit Property Held to Be Necessary for Effective Adjudication, and Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Injury Found in Favour of Plaintiff.

22 Jul 2021

The petitioner, M/s. Vaishnavi Sai Shri Mahalaxmi Jagdamba Shikshan Sanstha, filed two writ petitions challenging concurrent orders of the Small Cause...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Rent Control Ejectment Suit — Landlord's Bonafide Need Not Proved. Tenant's eviction set aside as landlord failed to establish bonafide requirement under Section 16(1)(g) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

24 Jul 2017

The petitioner, a tenant, challenged two civil suits for ejectment and possession filed by the respondents-landlords under Section 16(1)(g) of the Mah...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals in Specific Performance and Permanent Injunction. Trial Court Dismissed Specific Performance Suit and Decreed Injunction; Plaintiff's Claim of Agreement to Sell and Possession Not Accepted, Subsequent Purchaser's Possession Protected.

25 Sep 2021

The Regular First Appeals arose from a common judgment dated 13.09.2005 by the I Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in two suits: O....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11(a) CPC — Cause of Action Disclosed. Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because Judge Thinks Plaintiff May Not Succeed; Defence Not Material at This Stage.

29 Jul 2013

The appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court rejecting the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the Code of Ci...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition of Allottee in KIADB Act Case — Condition Requiring Prior Permission for Share Transfer Declared Ultra Vires. The Court held that the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board cannot impose restrictions on transfer of shares of an allottee company as such power is not conferred by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

12 Jan 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Kamalalayaa Real Estates LLP, a limited liability partnership firm, was allotted land by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Developme...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Government Corporation in Eviction Case — Corporation Held to be Government Undertaking Under West Bengal Government Premises Act. Leased Plots Part of Larger Industrial Estate Constitute Government Premises, Termination of Lease Valid.

18 Mar 2020

The case involves an appeal by the West Bengal Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd. (the Corporation) and its functionaries against an order ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Rent Recovery Suit — Hyderabad Rent Act Applicability During Pendency Does Not Bar Eviction Decree. Section 15(1) of Hyderabad Rent Act does not apply to decrees passed by civil court before the Act's extension to the area.

25 Jun 2012

The respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 5,200 towards arrears of rent, damages, and possession of the suit house against the appella...

34 35 36 37 38

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)