Search Results for "double recovery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "double recovery"

590 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 590 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witness Testimony. The court upheld the trial court's finding that the prosecution failed to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, as the informant's testimony was contradictory and not corroborated by independent witnesses.

30 Nov 2022

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of five accused persons in Sessions Trial No.611/2001 for offences under Sections 302, 307, 32...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand for Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Acquittal of Public Servant under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 upheld due to material contradictions and lack of credible evidence.

30 Jun 2021

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti Corruption Bureau, appealed against the judgment and order dated 5th August 2006 passed by the Special Judg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

22 Jan 2020

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Gopal Ambadas Gawali, a Police Head Constable, charged under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2)...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Explosives and Waging War Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Possession of Explosives Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Recovery of alleged RDX and hand grenades from accused not established due to contradictions in seizure witnesses and lack of independent corroboration.

24 Jan 2020

The State of Goa appealed against the acquittal of Tariq Ahmad Buttloo by the learned Adhoc Assistant Sessions Judge, FTC-I, South Goa at Margao, in S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 and 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

10 Sep 2020

The appellant, Sakharam Sitaram Bhise, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli in Sessions Trial Case No. 72/2010 for offences punisha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

22 Sep 2020

The judgment pertains to three appeals arising from a sessions case where two accused (Anand Roopchand Gajbhiye and Sandeep Namdeo Nimhan) were convic...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Section 324 IPC Case — Material Contradictions Between Oral Testimony and Medical Evidence Lead to Benefit of Doubt. The court upheld the trial court's finding that the prosecution failed to prove that the accused caused hurt by a dangerous weapon, as the injury was consistent with a blunt object, not a knife.

16 Feb 2010

The State of Goa filed an appeal against the judgment of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Vasco da Gama, acquitting the respondent-accused, Chandr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Unexecuted Lease Agreement — No Liability Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Adjudication under Section 31 cannot be basis for demand when document is not executed and no stamp duty is chargeable.

8 Aug 2019

The petitioner, Crisil Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, had been in occupation of office premises at Hiranandani Business Park, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEB's Challenge Against Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Refund of Recovery Ordered for Negligence in Retirement Processing. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that recovery of salary paid due to employer's negligence constitutes unfair labour practice under the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

24 Aug 2016

The petitioner, the erstwhile Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), challenged two judgments of the Industrial Court dated 31/01/2005 and 27/01/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEB's Challenge Against Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Refund of Excess Salary Paid Due to Negligence of Employees Not Recoverable. Held that recovery from employees for no fault of theirs would be unjust and amounts to unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

24 Aug 2016

The petitioner, the erstwhile Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court dated 31/01/2005 and 27/01/2...

34 35 36 37 38

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)