Search Results for "distinction between public order and law and order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "distinction between public order and law and order"

3207 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3207 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

4 Dec 2017

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Considers Maintainability of Suit Against Gratuitous Licensee Under Section 41 of Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882. Dispute Arises from Eviction Suit Filed Before Small Cause Court, Challenged for Lack of Jurisdiction Over Gratuitous Licence.

10 Jul 2007

The dispute arose from a suit for eviction filed in the Court of Small Causes at Bombay under section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 188...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Arbitral Award in Film Distribution Agreement Dispute. Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from termination of agreement over alleged plagiarism and failure to deliver a film.

11 Jul 2018

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was filed by Reliance Media Works Limited (formerly Adlabs Films Ltd.) ag...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Unmarried Woman's Appeal for Pregnancy Termination Under Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 - Interprets Rule 3B to Include Unmarried Women for Termination Up to Twenty-Four Weeks Based on Injury to Mental Health. The Court held that exclusion of unmarried women from Rule 3B violates Article 14 and that reproductive autonomy under Article 21 extends to all women, requiring purposive interpretation of the Act.

29 Sep 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 15 July 2022, where the appellant, an unmarried woman, sought permission to terminate h...

High Court

High Court Considers Whether Insurance Claim Dispute Pertaining to Overhauling Costs of Gas Turbine Engine is Quantum or Liability Dispute Under Policy Arbitration Clause. Insurer's Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Challenges Arbitral Award That Treated Overhaul Claim as Part of Quantum and Awarded Damages to Insured.

22 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from an Industrial All Risk Policy issued by the petitioner insurance company to the respondent's successor, covering a captive powe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case: Order II Rule 2 CPC Bar Applies to Subsequent Suit for Specific Performance When Relief of Permanent Injunction Was Sought in Previous Suit. The Court held that the plaintiff's entitlement to seek specific performance existed at the time of the first suit, and failure to include it bars the second suit under Order II Rule 2 CPC.

17 Jan 2025

The dispute arose from an agreement for sale dated 24.01.2007 between M/s Chemplast Cuddalore Vinyls Limited (respondent no.1/original plaintiff) and ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, in a PIL filed by a trade union of airport employees, pronounced an order on 14-09-2021, examining the legality of the privatisation of Mangaluru International Airport under the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. The court considered allegations that the concession agreement with Adani Enterprises Limited violated Sections 12, 12A, and 21 of the Act, and that the bidding process lacked transparency.

14 Sep 2021

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by the Airports Authority Employees Union, a registered trade ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Revision Against Summons for Offence Under Section 92 of Factories Act, 1948 for Alleged Violation of Rule 79-A(b) of Karnataka Factories Rules, 1969. Director Argues Lack of Vicarious Liability and Procedural Flaws, but Full Order Not Available.

22 Jul 2022

The revision petition was filed by a director of Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing beverages, seeking to qua...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal Against Review of Concurrent Findings in Forest Land Dispute Under Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967. High Court Exceeded Review Jurisdiction by Re-appreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Concurrent Findings of Fact.

22 Apr 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Telangana against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, which had revi...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Heard Constitutional Challenge to Section 31-A of the NDPS Act, 1985, Imposing Mandatory Death Penalty for Repeat Drug Offences. The petition questioned whether mandatory death penalty for non-homicidal drug offences under Section 31-A violates fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

16 Jun 2011

The matter involved two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitutional validity of Section 31-A of the Narc...

34 35 36 37 38

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)