Search Results for "developer permission"

638 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 638 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Pending Civil Suits Not a Bar to Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA: Quantum Park CHS v. AHCL-PEL & Ors

The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition filed by Quantum Park Cooperative Housing Society and quashed the order rejecting its application for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Land Acquisition under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 for Non-Compliance with Prior Notice Requirement under Section 13. Petitioners Allege Violation of Natural Justice as Ex-Parte Award Passed Without Proper Service of Notices and Without Following Section 17(5).

The High Court of Bombay heard two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land and a struc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Examines Challenge to Hotel Construction Permissions on Mandovi River Bank Under Coastal Regulation Zone Notification. Environmental Group Alleges Violations of CRZ Norms Due to Construction Within 100 Metres of High Tide Line.

The case originated from a writ petition filed in 1993 by an environmental society and an individual resident of Goa, challenging a series of permissi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under MRTP Act and NA permission under MLR Code.

The petitioner, originally Flagship Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and now Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a show ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Real Estate Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Agreement to Sell and Possession. Appellant failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform contract under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Mohammed Zain Khan, filed a Second Appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the ...