Search Results for "bombay tenancy act"

1754 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1754 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Civil Revision Applications by Tenants in Eviction Proceeding Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Tenants Raised Issues of Non-Decision of Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Applications, Delayed Judgment, and Misinterpretation of Section 15 of the Rent Act.

The Bombay High Court heard two Civil Revision Applications filed by tenants Vasant Mahadeo Gujar and Smt. Khatija Ismail Panhalkar against the common...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition; Revision Under Section 76 of BT & AL Act Maintainable Despite Prior Suo Motu Revision Under Section 76A. Full Bench Decision in Shireen Sami Gadiali (2011 (3) Mh.L.J. 486) Held Inapplicable as It Involved Section 154 of MCS Act, 1960, Not BT & AL Act.

The writ petition challenged an order of the President, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Mumbai, dismissing a tenancy revision application as not maintai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Non-Signatories Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act. Third Parties Cannot Appeal Interim Arbitral Orders Absent Privity of Arbitration Agreement.

The dispute arose from arbitration proceedings between Excel Metal Processors Pvt. Ltd. (respondent no.1) and Shakti International Private Limited (re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Plaintiffs in Tenancy Dispute — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Tenancy Rights. Court holds that mere possession or payment of rent does not establish tenancy without proof of lawful transfer or succession under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a dispute over a room (suit premises) allotted in lieu of an earlier tenanted room in a chawl at Mahim, Mumbai. The plaintiffs, Sulo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Examines Executability of Compromise Decree in Eviction Suit under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The court considers whether a compromise that does not refer to specific eviction grounds creates a fresh tenancy requiring new proceedings.

The respondent-landlord filed a suit against the petitioner-tenants seeking eviction under Section 16(1)(e)(ii) and (g) of the Maharashtra Rent Contro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Tribunal Order Granting Tenancy Rights to Respondents 3 and 4 Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 — Petitioner Failed to Prove Ownership or Adverse Possession.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by K.T. Venkatappa (since deceased, represented by his legal representatives) challenging the order dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Rent Recovery Suit. Denial of Landlord-Tenant Relationship Raises Triable Issue Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.

The petitioner, original defendant in Regular Civil Suit No.447/2009, filed a Civil Revision Application challenging the order dated 23.09.2010 passed...