KAHC010100302020_1
2 Dec 2021The petitioners, a group of renewable energy companies, filed multiple writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before t...
Search Results for "arbitration mandate"
657 result(s) found
Found 657 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Contractual Dispute — Constitution of Arbitral Tribunal Upheld Despite Appointment of Third Arbitrator by Appointing Authority. The court held that the appointment of a third arbitrator under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, without party consultation, is valid when one party fails to appoint its arbitrator, and the award on merits, including interest at 18% per annum, is not against public policy.
14 Sep 2010The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a judgment of the District Judge, Pune, which ...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award on Share Sale Proceeds. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that petitioner signed mandate letter for sale of shares and loan repayment, rejecting allegations of fraud and forgery.
19 May 2020The petitioner, Jackie Kukubhai Shroff, and the respondent, Ratnam Sudesh Iyer, were shareholders in Atlas Equipfin Pvt. Ltd. (Atlas), which held shar...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Section 9 Order in Arbitration Dispute Over Appointment of Court Receiver. Court holds that appointment of a Court Receiver to take possession of secured assets without considering the balance of convenience and irreparable loss is not warranted under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
26 Sep 2023The present appeal impugned an order dated 31st August 2023 passed by the Learned Single Judge in a Commercial Arbitration Petition filed by Responden...
- 17
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Tender for Smart Classrooms — Violation of Natural Justice and Legitimate Expectation. Government Order dated 5.7.2016 quashed as it was passed without hearing the successful bidder and without valid reasons.
11 Sep 2019The petitioner, M/s Siddharth Infotech Pvt Ltd, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the Governme...
- 55
High Court
High Court of Bombay Orders Partial Release of Goods from Court Receiver's Custody in Section 9 Arbitration Petition. Goods Not Included in Petitioner's Claim List Released on Petitioner's Consent, Pending Determination of Third-Party's Bona Fide Purchaser Status.
22 Oct 2019JSW Steel Limited entered into a Franchise Agreement dated 1 July 2018 with three sister concerns (Delta Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd., Yatin Steels Indi...
- 12
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order Appointing Arbitrator in Arbitration Dispute Due to Abandonment of Earlier Proceedings. Fresh Application Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Held Barred Under Order 23 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 as Claimant Had Ceased Participation Without Seeking Leave.
1 Apr 2026The dispute originated from joint participation in an auction conducted by Jammu & Kashmir Bank for land in Hoshiarpur, Punjab. The parties execut...
- 416
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Summary Suit Against Principal Borrower Despite Moratorium Against Guarantors Under IBC. The court permitted the plaintiff to proceed only against defendant no.1 (principal borrower) while reserving rights against guarantors under moratorium.
6 Apr 2026The plaintiff, IL & FS Financial Services Limited, filed a commercial summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to recover ...
- 117
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Rejection of Interim Injunction — No Error in Arbitral Tribunal's Discretion. The court held that the scope of appeal under Section 37 is limited and the arbitral tribunal's discretionary order under Section 17 cannot be interfered with unless perverse or capricious.
10 Jun 2022The petitioner, AshokPalav Coop. Housing Society Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an o...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Cooperative Bank Dispute — Upholds Tribunal's Finding That Petitioner Was Not Entitled to Be Heard Before Enquiry Report Was Tabled. The court held that the principles of natural justice were not violated as the petitioner was given an opportunity to respond after the report was placed before the Board.
5 Feb 2013The petitioner, Nazim H. Kazi, was a member of the respondent, Kokan Mercantile Cooperative Bank Ltd., since 1986 and served as its Chairman from 25th...
- 65
