Search Results for "arbitral award execution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitral award execution"

925 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 925 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Arbitration Application and Petition for Interim Measures in Partnership Dispute Over Commercial Project. No Arbitration Agreement Found in Memorandum of Understanding Dated 16 October 2017 Under Sections 9 and 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Thus Relief Denied.

4 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a partnership firm, Respondents, involved in developing 'Ventura Commercial Hub'. The petitioner, was admitted as a partner in ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears and Reserves Order on Interim Measures in Intellectual Property Dispute with Foreign Seated Arbitration. Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act Questions Indian Court's Jurisdiction and Maintainability of Mandatory Injunction.

31 Jul 2026

The applicant, a Singapore-incorporated company engaged in software development, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Arbitration Petitions Challenging Award on Agreement for Sale — Refund Ordered Instead of Specific Performance. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's refusal to grant specific performance but reduced the interest rate on refund from 8% to 6% per annum under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Mar 2023

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions arising from a common arbitral award dated 31st March 2022. The dispute originated from a registered a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Arrest of Judgment Debtor in Execution of Foreign Decree — Conversion Rate for Decretal Amount Must Be Determined Before Arrest. The court held that before ordering arrest under Order 21 Rule 37 CPC, the exact amount payable in Indian rupees must be ascertained when the decree is in foreign currency.

13 Aug 2013

The Bombay High Court dealt with three chamber summons arising out of execution proceedings of a foreign decree. The original suit was filed in Englan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Service Tax Reimbursement Dispute. Contractual interpretation of service tax liability under security services contract upheld by arbitrator.

21 Aug 2015

The petitioner, Bombay Intelligence Security (India) Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Anti-Anti-Suit Injunction Restraining Enforcement of Singapore Anti-Suit Order in NCLT Oppression and Mismanagement Dispute. Court holds that disputes under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 are non-arbitrable and exclusively triable by NCLT, and that an anti-suit injunction from a foreign court cannot be enforced in India to prevent a party from pursuing statutory remedies before the NCLT.

11 Sep 2023

The plaintiff, Anupam Mittal, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking an anti-anti-suit injunction to restrain the defendants from enforcing an ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Securities Arbitration Case — Interest Award Not an Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review under Section 114 CPC read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is not an appeal; mere disagreement with the judgment is not a ground for review.

23 Nov 2018

The review petition was filed by Kotak Securities Ltd. seeking review of the judgment dated 22.02.2013 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in RFA No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Overhead Losses and Loss of Profit Claims Based on Hudson's Formula Without Proof of Actual Loss. The court held that an arbitral award granting overhead losses and loss of profit without evidence of actual loss is patently illegal and contrary to public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Jan 2013

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a judgment of a Learned Single Judge dated 11 Nove...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitral Award and Recovery Order Under Article 227 — Alternative Remedy Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Not Availed. The court held that a writ petition under Article 227 is not maintainable when the petitioner has not availed the statutory remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to challenge an arbitral award under the Multi State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002.

7 Jun 2018

The petitioners, Rajendra Baban Deshmukh and Sangita Rajendra Deshmukh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Set Aside for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's rejection of the counterclaim without considering evidence and without granting an opportunity to be heard amounted to a patent illegality and breach of natural justice.

17 Dec 2025

The case involves an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Reliance Naval and Engineering Ltd....

34 35 36 37 38

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)