Search Results for "Prosecutrix testimony"

518 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 518 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 452, 376AB, 506 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Anand S/o Durgappa Gollar, was convicted by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Belagavi in Special Case No.505/2023 fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Sentence of Accused in Rape of Minor Case from 10 Years to 7 Years. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Upheld Based on Credible Testimony of 9-Year-Old Victim and Medical Evidence.

The judgment arises from two appeals: Criminal Appeal No.1172 of 2007 filed by the accused Pandurang Lalasaheb Yadav challenging his conviction and se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor under Goa Children's Act and IPC. Testimony of victim alone held sufficient for conviction, delay in FIR explained.

The appellant, Deepak Nanku Singh, was convicted by the Children's Court, Panaji for the offence punishable under Section 8(2) of the Goa Children's A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Rape of Minor Case — Victim's Testimony Found Credible. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act upheld as medical evidence and prompt FIR corroborate victim's account.

The appellant, Ganesh Laxman Madne, was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in Special Case No.44/2015 for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was unreliable and medical evidence did not support the allegations.

The appellant, Narayana Swamy, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chikkaballapura (sitting at Chintamani) in Spl.S.C.No.3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Age Evidence and Lack of Consent Proof. Conviction for Rape and Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Minority and Non-Consensual Nature of Relationship.

The appellant, Pravin Popat Kharat, was convicted by the Special Judge under POCSO Act, Ahmednagar, for offences under Section 376(1) IPC and Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Girl in Neighbor's House — Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offence Under Sections 376, 342, and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Vishnudas s/o Uddhao Bhagade, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 376 (rape), 342 (wrongful co...