Search Results for "Marks Disclosure"

434 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 434 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Premium and Interest Demands for Leasehold Land Conversion in Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's demand for premium and interest under Development Charges Rules and lease terms upheld as valid and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, Shelton Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Neelkanth Infratech Co., and M/s. Juhi Habitat Pvt. Ltd., were lessees of plots in Navi Mumbai under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery, Acquits Accused of Rape Due to Lack of Evidence. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder and Section 392 IPC for robbery, but acquitted under Section 376 IPC as prosecution failed to prove rape.

The case pertains to the murder of a woman and robbery of her gold ornaments. The deceased was last seen with accused No.1 (Ajijkhan Pathan). Subseque...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Criminal Writ Jurisdiction — Quashes FIR for Non-Disclosure of Cognizable Offence. Court holds that FIR must disclose all ingredients of alleged offence; mere registration of FIR without prima facie case is abuse of process of law.

The petitioner, Neelam Nitin Sampat, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Golf Course Construction in CRZ Area. Court holds that the subject land is not within CRZ limits based on the approved CRZ map, and the petitioner failed to establish any illegality in the permissions granted.

The petitioner, Sunil Sureshchandra Agarwal, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish complete chain of circumstances.

The appellant, Ganesh Madhav Rajpanke, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Sanjay Rajpankhe and sentenced...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Lacked Consistency and Corroboration.

The appellant, Satish Mahadeo Kale, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife, Manisha, by setting her on fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Well Disposal Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Incriminating Articles Sufficient to Sustain Life Imprisonment Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellants, Gautam Kamlakar Pardeshi and Rahul @ Lalya Yogesh Jadhav, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai, for the murder of an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Cruelty in Dowry Demand Case. Appellant convicted under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC for killing his wife after she refused to arrange Rs. 50,000 for his business.

The appellant, Ramesh Chagan Vithore, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur, for the murder of his wife Kalpana under Section 302 I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Rajesh Kumar Yedurajsingh Bhadoriya, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No. 302/2010 for the murde...