WRIT PETITION NO.323 OF 2000
18 Oct 2005Multiple writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various companies, including Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and India...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966"
678 result(s) found
Found 678 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Declaration of Lapsed Reservation Under Section 127 MRTP Act for Failure to Acquire Land Within Statutory Period. Planning Authority's Inaction for Over a Decade Leads to De-reservation of Land Reserved for Garden and Residential Zone.
3 Aug 2017The petitioners, owners of land in Rahata, Ahmednagar, filed two sister writ petitions seeking a declaration that the reservation imposed on their lan...
- 90
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Declaration of Lapsed Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act — Land Reserved for D.P. Road and Social Welfare Not Acquired Within Reasonable Time After Purchase Notice. The court held that re-reservation in a revised development plan cannot revive a lapsed reservation under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
21 Jan 2016The petitioners, owners of agricultural land bearing Gat No.87/1 at Mouza Digras, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the reservation of ...
- 185
High Court
Bombay High Court Admits Petition Challenging Rejection of Tender Bids for NAINA Infrastructure Project; Interim Stay Ordered. CIDCO Tender Committee Rejected Petitioner's Joint Venture Bids Citing Integrity Pact, GST Registration, and Other Non-Compliances.
6 May 2025This writ petition was filed by Thakur Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd. (the lead member of a joint venture with EVRASCON) challenging the rejection of its tec...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Commencement Certificates for Construction Near Military Airbase. Court holds that mere proximity to a military airbase does not automatically invalidate building permissions, and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate any specific violation of the Aircraft Act, 1934 or the Works of Defence Act, 1903.
23 Oct 2023The Union of India, through the Ministry of Defence, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of Commencement Certificates ...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging TDR Loading and FSI Computation for Redevelopment Project. Court upholds MCGM's permission for TDR and fungible FSI, finding no illegality or public interest violation.
30 Sep 2014The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the permission gr...
- 147
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction in Cessed Building Area — No Violation of DCR Found. Petitioner failed to establish that the construction violated Development Control Regulations or that the building was a cessed building under MHADA.
20 Feb 2023The petitioner, Asif Abdul Sattar, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a building by Respo...
- 54
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Writ Petition and Quashes Impugned Letter Declaring Reservation Lapsed Under Section 49(7) of MRTP Act. Court Holds That Failure to Initiate Acquisition Under Section 126 Within One Year of Confirmed Purchase Notice Leads to Automatic Lapse, and Deems Development Permission Granted Under Section 45(5) Due to Non-communication of Decision.
4 Dec 2017The petitioners, owners of agricultural land in Beed town, challenged the continuing reservation of their land as a garden in the development plan of ...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Notification under Section 20(4) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Court Holds No Additional Hearing Required After Considering Objections; Acquisition Proceedings Challenge Not Concluded.
3 Jul 2012The petitioners, owners of Gat No. 264 in Village Varsoli, Pune, challenged two actions by the State and Lonavala Municipal Council. The adjoining Gat...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Commissioner's Order on Building Proposal Validity — Held That Commissioner's Decision Under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Is Final and Not Subject to Judicial Review on Merits.
11 Feb 2016The petitioner, M/s Mahendra Builders, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order d...
- 163
