Search Results for "Limitation Act, 1908"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Limitation Act, 1908"

1858 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1858 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — Rejects Plaint Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Suit for Partition and Separate Possession of Joint Family Property Not Barred by Limitation as Perpetual Right to Seek Partition Recognized Under Hindu Law.

22 Apr 2026

The present Regular First Appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the judgment and decree dated 24.02...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Vesting of Private Forest Land Under Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971. The court affirmed the tribunal's rejection of the claimant's exemption plea due to insufficient evidence of principal cultivation as plantation under Section 2(f) of the Act.

29 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a dispute over the vesting of land under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971. The respondent, Popular ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal by Complainant Society in Cheque Dishonour Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Limitation Error and Failure to Rebut Presumption. The court held that the complaint was within limitation and the accused did not rebut the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt.

22 Jun 2010

The appellant, VPK Urban Co-operative Credit Society Limited, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the accused, Narayan S. Naik, by the Ju...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Injunction Restraining Bank from Enforcing Corporate Guarantee. The court set aside the injunction as the guarantee deed was unconditional and the bank had a prima facie case under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, enabling it to proceed under SARFAESI Act and IBC.

17 Feb 2026

The appeal arose from an order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the LXXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (Commercial Court) in I.A. No....

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Second Appeal in Municipal Tort Case — Limitation Bar Under Section 304 of Maharashtra Municipal Council Act Applies to Suit for Damages for Removal of Fencing. Suit filed beyond six months from date of cause of action is barred by limitation under Section 304 of the Maharashtra Municipal Council Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Township Act, 1965.

30 Jun 2017

The respondent, Laxminarayan Jaiswal, claimed to have purchased plot nos. 71 and 72 within the limits of Gram Panchayat Drugwada on 16-12-1985. Subseq...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Commercial Appeal Against Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit Under Order XXXVII CPC. The Appeal Centres on Whether Section 12A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Mandates Pre-Institution Mediation and Whether the Single Judge Correctly Required Deposit of the Suit Amount.

1 Oct 2021

The dispute arose from a commercial summary suit filed by the respondent against the appellant for recovery of Rs.5.54 crores with accrued interest. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Permanent Lok Adalat's Jurisdiction in Service Dispute. The Court held that the dispute concerning recovery of excess payment from pension and gratuity of a retired employee of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran relates to a public utility service under Section 22A(b) of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and the Permanent Lok Adalat has jurisdiction.

10 Aug 2022

The Petitioner, the Chief Administrative Officer of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 29 June 2019 pas...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeals in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court upheld trial and first appellate court decisions that plaintiff failed to prove title and possession over suit property, and that suit was barred by limitation.

18 Jun 2025

The judgment pertains to three Regular Second Appeals (RSA No. 2256/2006, RSA No. 2257/2006, and RSA No. 2258/2006) filed by the legal representatives...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.

9 Oct 2015

The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...

34 35 36 37 38

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)