Search Results for "Appellate Side"

6735 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6735 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeals in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. Court finds no substantial question of law as appellant failed to prove title and respondent established adverse possession.

The case involves two cross suits between the appellant, Chandrakant Ramchandra Godhvinde, and the respondent, Anna Bhau Lone, concerning a property a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact on Encroachment and Title. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and concurrent findings of fact are not perverse.

The case involves two cross suits between Chandrakant Ramchandra Godhvinde (appellant) and Anna Bhau Lone (respondent) concerning a property admeasuri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

The present second appeal arises out of a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction filed by the original plaintiff Basavaiah (since dece...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Title and Possession. Family Arrangement and Adverse Possession Claims Fail as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Possession and Necessary Parties Were Not Impleaded.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the defendant Selvaraj against the concurrent judgments of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Second Appeals on Validity of Gift Deed and Revocation Deed in Joint Family Property. The Appeals Concern Whether a Gift Deed by a Karta Is Void against Coparceners and Whether a Revocation Deed Is Illegal.

The litigation arose from two suits concerning a house property bearing Municipal No. 8-11-181/800 in Raichur, claimed as joint family property of whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Arbitrator Under Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. Single Judge Holds Rule 18 of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 Not Exhaustive and Maintains Jurisdiction Under Article 226.

The petitioner, M/s. Modern Anitasha Electronics, a proprietorship concern, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Clarifies Jurisdiction for Writ Petitions Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. Rule 18 of Chapter XVII of Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960 mandates that such petitions be heard by a Division Bench.

The Bombay High Court, in this judgment, addressed the procedural confusion regarding whether writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Second Appeal Against Concurrent Findings Dismissing Injunction Suit Based on Compromise Decree. Substantial Questions on Res Judicata and Minor Guardian Not Signing Compromise Raised.

The case involved a second appeal before the High Court of Madras arising out of a suit for permanent injunction filed by the plaintiffs-appellants ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Rent Control Dispute — Lease Deed Not Required to Be Registered Under Section 107 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 for Monthly Tenancy. Tenant's Possession Held to Be Lawful Under Agreement of Lease, Not Liable for Eviction.

The plaintiff, Mahendra Valji Rathod, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Milk Tanker Driver Established by Minor Son's Testimony. Court upholds award of Rs.1,65,000 to widow and children of deceased Kailashchandra under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra and other appellants appealed against the judgment and award dated 5 August 1995 of the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal (MACT)...