Search Results for "witness restriction"

685 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 685 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Slum Development Agreement Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act. Civil Court Cannot Entertain Disputes Relating to Slum Rehabilitation Schemes as Exclusive Jurisdiction Vests with Slum Authorities.

The plaintiff, Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement dated 10 August 2003, entered in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Liable for Death of Student. The court affirmed the Tribunal's award of Rs. 4,50,000 with interest, rejecting the Insurance Company's plea of breach of policy conditions and contributory negligence.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the parents of Rajesh, a 19-year-old student who died in a road accident on 4-5 July 199...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation of Rs.19,30,000 for Death of Ganeshan. Negligence of Driver of Insured Vehicle Established, and Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the Regional Manager of National Insurance Company Limited against the judgment and award dated 22.09.2016 passed by the IX Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — No Contributory Negligence by Deceased Driver. Insurer Failed to Prove Negligence of Deceased in Head-On Collision with Tempo; MACT Award of Rs. 71,36,917 Upheld.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the respondents (claimants) being the legal heirs of Sudam Auti, who died in a head-on collision ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC, Upholding Concurrent Findings on Will and Possession. No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Findings of Fact Are Not Perverse.

The appellant, original defendant Jayawant (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Illegal Mining Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Mines and Mineral Act and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of minerals beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Dinesh and Cheluvamurthy, were convicted by the II Additional Sessions and Special Judge at Mysuru in Special Case No.85/2018 for offe...