Search Results for "water supply agreement"

709 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 709 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Return Plaint for Lack of Jurisdiction in Summary Suit for Recovery of Money. Court holds that cause of action arose outside Mumbai and City Civil Court lacked territorial jurisdiction under Section 16 CPC.

The petitioner, Naran Lala Pvt. Ltd., a company based in Navsari, Gujarat, challenged an order dated 25.11.2014 passed by the City Civil Court at Bomb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petitions Challenging MHADA's Cancellation of Police Housing Lease — Allotment Under Slum Rehabilitation Scheme at Gaikwad Nagar Questioned

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard two connected writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Order on Petitions to Quash FIRs in Joint Development Project Dispute. Petitions Challenge Three Separate Criminal Proceedings for Breach of Agreement, Cheating, Forgery, and Bribery in Procurement of Occupancy Certificate for Residential Villa Project.

The High Court of Karnataka heard three criminal petitions filed by Sri Aditya Kankaria, a director of M/s KSM Niketan Pvt. Ltd., seeking quashing of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Tender for Smart Classrooms — Violation of Natural Justice and Legitimate Expectation. Government Order dated 5.7.2016 quashed as it was passed without hearing the successful bidder and without valid reasons.

The petitioner, M/s Siddharth Infotech Pvt Ltd, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the Governme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010069912016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition in Redevelopment Dispute — Dissenting Member Cannot Obstruct Majority Decision for Dilapidated Building. Court Appoints Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to Resolve Dispute Between Developer, Society, and Dissenting Member.

The Bombay High Court dealt with an arbitration petition filed by Chirag Infra Projects Pvt Ltd, the developer, against Vijay Jwala Cooperative Housin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Closure Permission for Textile Mills Under Section 25-O of Industrial Disputes Act. The Court Stresses Need for Genuine and Adequate Grounds and Balances Industrial Needs with Worker Welfare, While Exercising Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The dispute arose from the closure of two textile establishments, the Crown Mills Division and Process House Unit of Hindustan Spinning and Weaving Mi...